1. Rob, bug fix/suggestion

Rob, if you have some time, can you consider this request...
  What I'm trying to do is put() data to either the screen or a file, without
having to use if and then statements.  IE puts(output,"BLAH").  I want to add
one more output mode, which is none, but still refrain from using the if and
then statements.  I was wondering if you could make puts(-1,"Blah") go
nowhere.  In other words, if puts() sees -1, it will just end the procedure
right there.  This could be a good bug fix too.  If someone is opening a file
and printing to it (like moi), then this would avoid crashing the program if
the file doesn't open for some reason.  I could say "unable to open file
ABC.XYZ", then when it tries to print to the file handle (-1), the program
will still work.
  Or, if you don't like that, could you make 0 the code for nowhere?

Thanks,
Derek Brown

new topic     » topic index » view message » categorize

2. Re: Rob, bug fix/suggestion

On Mon, 6 Sep 1999 09:09:35 EDT, Derek Brown <Cyrusbrown at AOL.COM> wrote:

>then statements.  I was wondering if you could make puts(-1,"Blah") go
>nowhere.  In other words, if puts() sees -1, it will just end the procedure
>right there.  This could be a good bug fix too.  If someone is opening a


Derek:
   Why can't you do this:

   While handle != -1 do
      puts(handle, "Blah")
   end while

Bernie

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

3. Re: Rob, bug fix/suggestion

<< Derek:
    Why can't you do this:

    While handle != -1 do
       puts(handle, "Blah")
    end while

 Bernie >>

  I could, very easily.  But, I have about 100 different puts() commands
spread out in different places in the code.  I'm trying hard to avoid using
if and while statements.
  I have already figured out the solution though.  DOH!  All I had to do was
make a custom puts command, PUTS(handle,"blah")...

global procedure PUTS(integer mode, sequence stuff)
  if mode != -1 then
    puts(mode,stuff)
  end if
end procedure

  DOH! that was pretty easy.  I still think that would be a pretty nice
feature to the language though.  One tiny stability improvement.

Derek Brown

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

4. Re: Rob, bug fix/suggestion

Derek Brown writes:
>  I have already figured out the solution though.  DOH!
> All I had to do was make a custom puts command,
> PUTS(handle,"blah")...

Under DOS and Windows everything you
write to the NUL device is quietly discarded.
e.g.

    integer nowhere
    nowhere = open("NUL", "w")
    puts(nowhere, "Hello?\n")

If you can't open a particular file, you could set the file
handle to nowhere, and the output would be discarded.

On Linux you can open "/dev/null" for the same purpose.

You can also redirect standard output into NUL,
e.g. on system commands:

     system("del temp.dat > NUL", 2)

Your solution (using an alternate routine for puts)
is probably just as good.

Regards,
     Rob Craig
     Rapid Deployment Software
     http://www.RapidEuphoria.com

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu