1. win32lib.ew
I had some undesirable output in a program, and went to trace it.. And my
win32lib.ew is not stamped! (I don't have the registered version, yes I'm a
cheapskate)
Turns out that the .zip file that I got from the contributions list contains the
same non-stamped file, but the list shows it as being stamped.
1. That should probably be fixed...
2. Can somebody PLEASE send me a win32lib.ew 0.57.9 that is stamped? Please?
====
Pat
***********************************************************************
***********************************************************************
2. Re: win32lib.ew
>From: Patrick.Barnes at transgrid.com.au
>Subject: win32lib.ew
>
>
>I had some undesirable output in a program, and went to trace it.. And my
>win32lib.ew is not stamped! (I don't have the registered version, yes I'm a
>cheapskate)
>
>Turns out that the .zip file that I got from the contributions list
>contains the same non-stamped file, but the list shows it as being stamped.
>
>1. That should probably be fixed...
A stamped version is there.
>2. Can somebody PLEASE send me a win32lib.ew 0.57.9 that is stamped?
>Please?
There is a stamped version on RDS. However, it is version 0.55.1. Version
0.57.9 is not stamped because it is unstable. There are at least 3 versions
above it anyway.
>
>
>====
>Pat
>
>
Euphoria Instant Messenger
Have YOU Joined?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/euim/
3. Re: win32lib.ew
From: "Elliott Sales de Andrade"
> There is a stamped version on RDS. However, it is version 0.55.1. Version
> 0.57.9 is not stamped because it is unstable. There are at least 3 versions
> above it anyway.
Alas...
onDestroy[] won't work in 0.55.1, or 0.55.5,
and setHint() won't? work in 0.57.9,
...nevermind setFocus()
and the 'x' versions above probably aren't any better...
...nevermind the numerous 'resource leak' versions.
Q. Is there an 'archived' ver.0.57.9 available anywhere ?
