1. asearch
- Posted by Robert Szalay <robsz1 at hotpop.com> Jan 10, 2003
- 512 views
Hello list. Just wondering.. What kind of features do you guys and gals think should be in asearch (the Archive search engine on the rds site) ? Regards, Robert Szalay
2. Re: asearch
- Posted by cafromsw at yahoo.com Jan 10, 2003
- 470 views
I hoping replying to the list with this is ok. I would like to be able to do a search like this: +draganddrop +"drag and drop" -listview which would hopefully give me everything on draganddrop and "drag and drop" not concerning listviews. Which probably wouldn't be very much but you get the idea. I appologize in advance if that functionality is there and I just haven't figured out how to use it. Thanks Chris cafromsw at yahoo.com --- Robert Szalay <robsz1 at hotpop.com> wrote: > > Hello list. > > Just wondering.. > > What kind of features do you guys and gals think > should be in asearch > (the > Archive search engine on the rds site) ? > > > Regards, > Robert Szalay > > > > > TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. > FREE! > > >
3. Re: asearch
- Posted by Robert Craig <rds at RapidEuphoria.com> Jan 12, 2003
- 476 views
Robert Szalay writes: > Maybe RDS will use it as the official Archive search engine ?? I'd like to see it. If it's significantly better, we'll use it. If it's marginally better, probably not, since it will cost me extra time in future maintenance efforts. By the way, speed is not an issue for the file archive search. It currently uses about 0.1 seconds to search the EDS database. Any other delay you see is network delay. Regards, Rob Craig Rapid Deployment Software http://www.RapidEuphoria.com
4. Re: asearch
- Posted by Robert Craig <rds at RapidEuphoria.com> Jan 12, 2003
- 534 views
Robert Szalay writes: > I borrowed the lower() that you used in asearch after i tested and found > it was faster. (on my computer, beat wildcard.e's lower by about 12 > seconds over 100,000 passes) > Maybe it should become the official lower() ? > Q: Are you going to get rid of some of the include files ? > Some of the stuff seems to me that it should be built-in. Getting rid of an include file would break a lot of code. upper/lower can be done faster, but I like the extremely short, and completely general versions in wildcard.e In general, I like to implement library routines in Euphoria, rather than enlarge the interpreter by coding them in C. The speed difference is usually not that bad compared to hand-coded C, especially when you use the EtoC Translator. Regards, Rob Craig Rapid Deployment Software http://www.RapidEuphoria.com
5. Re: asearch
- Posted by Pete Lomax <petelomax at blueyonder.co.uk> Jan 13, 2003
- 464 views
Tell you what would be real nice. List programs that use a specified function or procedure, eg getPrintChoice (obviously only when the source is distributed). I can see that might be just a tad tricky. Pete
6. Re: asearch
- Posted by jbrown1050 at hotpop.com Jan 17, 2003
- 468 views
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 03:32:32PM +1100, Patrick.Barnes at transgrid.com.au wrote: > > What about integrating some of guru.ex into the archive search engine? I think > that would be quite interesting to see how well it performed. I second. > > > *********************************************************************** > > > *********************************************************************** > > > > TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE! -- /"\ ASCII ribbon \ / campain against X HTML e-mail and /*\ news and unneeded MIME