1. Euphoria 2.5 problem
Hi, I'm Umberto Capasso
Does anyone have a problem launch a EXW program with 2.5 ?
so eg. lauch any winIDE or windows application
launch and run veeery slowwly
I've win 98 and a pentium 120 Mhz
with 2.4 all thing works perfect ( I still using this until solve this problem)
thanks
2. Re: Euphoria 2.5 problem
Umberto Capasso wrote:
>
>
> Hi, I'm Umberto Capasso
>
> Does anyone have a problem launch a EXW program with 2.5 ?
> so eg. lauch any winIDE or windows application
> launch and run veeery slowwly
> I've win 98 and a pentium 120 Mhz
> with 2.4 all thing works perfect ( I still using this until solve this
> problem)
>
That is a known problem. My solution was to revert to 2.4.
Robert Craig has partially fixed it, but not fully, so until
it's fully fixed, I won't upgrade.
Regards, Alexander Toresson
Shhh! Be vewy quiet! I'm hunting wuntime ewwows!
3. Re: Euphoria 2.5 problem
Umberto Capasso wrote:
> Does anyone have a problem launch a EXW program with 2.5 ?
> so eg. lauch any winIDE or windows application
> launch and run veeery slowwly
> I've win 98 and a pentium 120 Mhz
> with 2.4 all thing works perfect ( I still using this until solve this
> problem)
Things will be much better with 2.5 beta.
Until then, consider downloading the translated/compiled version
of the IDE. See the November 21 Recent User contribution of Aku:
http://www.rapideuphoria.com/ide_c.zip
(Also, Andy Drummond has an ide.exe bound with the 2.4 interpreter).
Just drop ide.exe into your IDE directory, where ide.exw
is stored. It should load and run even faster than using 2.4.
Also, it's a good idea to remove "with trace" or
"with profile" from your program, as well as Win32Lib.ew etc.
These things use extra memory, and could greatly increase the
load time of a large program, on a machine with a small memory.
The run-time and memory used by 2.5 (after parsing) are
both at least as good or better than 2.4. It's just the
initial load time (parsing) of large programs that can be
much slower on old machines like yours, but this will
improve greatly with 2.5 beta. People with newer machines
can barely notice any difference.
Of course, translating or binding with 2.5 will eliminate the
load time for any program, since no parsing is required.
Regards,
Rob Craig
Rapid Deployment Software
http://www.RapidEuphoria.com
4. Re: Euphoria 2.5 problem
Alexander Toresson wrote:
>
> Umberto Capasso wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi, I'm Umberto Capasso
> >
> > Does anyone have a problem launch a EXW program with 2.5 ?
> > so eg. lauch any winIDE or windows application
> > launch and run veeery slowwly
> > I've win 98 and a pentium 120 Mhz
It's not Euphoria that needs upgraded...
You can probably find a better computer for 50$!
> > with 2.4 all thing works perfect ( I still using this until solve this
> > problem)
> >
>
> That is a known problem. My solution was to revert to 2.4.
> Robert Craig has partially fixed it, but not fully, so until
> it's fully fixed, I won't upgrade.
>
> Regards, Alexander Toresson
>
> Shhh! Be vewy quiet! I'm hunting wuntime ewwows!
>
5. Re: Euphoria 2.5 problem
CoJaBo wrote:
>
> Alexander Toresson wrote:
> >
> > Umberto Capasso wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi, I'm Umberto Capasso
> > >
> > > Does anyone have a problem launch a EXW program with 2.5 ?
> > > so eg. lauch any winIDE or windows application
> > > launch and run veeery slowwly
> > > I've win 98 and a pentium 120 Mhz
> It's not Euphoria that needs upgraded...
> You can probably find a better computer for 50$!
I disagree. Of course, you can always tell people to upgrade their
computers. But Euphoria *should* run even on a low-end computer.
It did in 2.4. Why shouldn't it in 2.5? I'm having the same problem
on a p2 300mhz.
[snip]
Regards, Alexander Toresson
Shhh! Be vewy quiet! I'm hunting wuntime ewwows!
6. Re: Euphoria 2.5 problem
On 11 Dec 2004, at 3:53, Alexander Toresson wrote:
>
>
> posted by: Alexander Toresson <toressonodakra at swipnet.se>
>
> CoJaBo wrote:
> >
> > Alexander Toresson wrote:
> > >
> > > Umberto Capasso wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi, I'm Umberto Capasso
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone have a problem launch a EXW program with 2.5 ?
> > > > so eg. lauch any winIDE or windows application
> > > > launch and run veeery slowwly
> > > > I've win 98 and a pentium 120 Mhz
> > It's not Euphoria that needs upgraded...
> > You can probably find a better computer for 50$!
>
> I disagree. Of course, you can always tell people to upgrade their
> computers. But Euphoria *should* run even on a low-end computer.
> It did in 2.4. Why shouldn't it in 2.5? I'm having the same problem
> on a p2 300mhz.
I thought he was offering to send the $50! I know people who have $50 per
month to live on in the usa, and that's not so easy.
Kat
