1. Re: NAMESPACE
- Posted by tone.skoda at siol.net Apr 12, 2002
- 320 views
Yes, I also want that! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bernie Ryan" <xotron at localnet.com> To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com> Subject: NAMESPACE > > > Why wasn't namespace implemented so that if no quailifier > was used then the name without the qualifier would be assumed to be the > one to use. > > include FOO1.e > include FOO2.e as x > > ? bar > ? x:bar > > That way I can add FOO2.e into a program and use the code > in a large program that is already written without > modifying all the code to add quailfier. > > What I am saying is that NO QAUILIFIER should be assumed as the > default namespace. > > Bernie > > > >