1. Re: NAMESPACE

Yes, I also want that!

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bernie Ryan" <xotron at localnet.com>
To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com>
Subject: NAMESPACE 


> 
> 
> Why wasn't namespace implemented so that if no quailifier
> was used then the name without the qualifier would be assumed to be the 
> one to use.
> 
> include FOO1.e
> include FOO2.e as x
> 
> ? bar
> ? x:bar
> 
> That way I can add FOO2.e into a program and use the code
> in a large program that is already written without
> modifying all the code to add quailfier.
> 
> What I am saying is that NO QAUILIFIER should be assumed as the
> default namespace.
> 
> Bernie
> 
> 
> 
>

new topic     » topic index » view message » categorize

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu