1. RE: contest #2 derek
petelomax at blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
> I did actually post the best algorithm in #3...
What was your approach? I've not looked at your code yet, but I'd be
interested in how you approached it. Have you seen my code? Any tweak
suggestions? :)
> WOW! Two tiny changes: 97.42%
For me, one tiny change: 100%.
2. RE: contest #2 derek
Derek -
Can you get Rob to post your code in the archives? I only access this
list through the web interface, and don't get attachments. I was trying
an approach that sounds a lot like yours, and am really interested in
how you implemented it. I think I overused appends, etc. and this cost
me too much time in building the "dictionary".
Thanks
George
Derek Parnell wrote:
> Attached is the code I sent to Robert.
> ----------
> Derek.
>
>
