1. Run time compiled euphoria
Would it be better/faster if euphoria was run time compiled like java
is, with JIT(just in time) compiling? And what would be necessary to
make it fast, and platform independent.
Dan
2. Re: Run time compiled euphoria
codepilot Gmail Account wrote:
> Would it be better/faster if euphoria was run time compiled like java
> is, with JIT(just in time) compiling? And what would be necessary to
> make it fast, and platform independent.
I have no interest in doing that.
JIT means compiling right down to machine code just
before executing the program. That means a longer
start-up delay. The execution speed would be no better than
the Translator provides now. It would mean developing a lot of extra
code, with inevitable bugs, and that work would not be easily
portable to another CPU.
Regards,
Rob Craig
Rapid Deployment Software
http://www.RapidEuphoria.com
3. Re: Run time compiled euphoria
I was hoping it would give the speed of the translator with the
startup time of the interpreter.
Dan
On 4/21/05, Robert Craig <guest at rapideuphoria.com> wrote:
>
> posted by: Robert Craig <rds at RapidEuphoria.com>
>
> codepilot Gmail Account wrote:
> > Would it be better/faster if euphoria was run time compiled like java
> > is, with JIT(just in time) compiling? And what would be necessary to
> > make it fast, and platform independent.
>
> I have no interest in doing that.
> JIT means compiling right down to machine code just
> before executing the program. That means a longer
> start-up delay. The execution speed would be no better than
> the Translator provides now. It would mean developing a lot of extra
> code, with inevitable bugs, and that work would not be easily
> portable to another CPU.
>
> Regards,
> Rob Craig
> Rapid Deployment Software
> http://www.RapidEuphoria.com
>
>
>
>
>
4. Re: Run time compiled euphoria
Robert Craig wrote:
>
>
>posted by: Robert Craig <rds at RapidEuphoria.com>
>
>codepilot Gmail Account wrote:
>
>
>>Would it be better/faster if euphoria was run time compiled like java
>>is, with JIT(just in time) compiling? And what would be necessary to
>>make it fast, and platform independent.
>>
>>
>I have no interest in doing that.
>JIT means compiling right down to machine code just
>before executing the program. That means a longer
>start-up delay. The execution speed would be no better than
>the Translator provides now. It would mean developing a lot of extra
>code, with inevitable bugs, and that work would not be easily
>portable to another CPU.
>
>Regards,
> Rob Craig
> Rapid Deployment Software
> http://www.RapidEuphoria.com
>
>
>
>
Something is wrong with Topica. I've been reading listfilter all day
but this is the last message in my email box.
--
==============================
Too many freaks, not enough circuses.
j.
