1. RE: Matt...EuCom...again
Jonas wrote:
>
> Matt,
>
> Before I pester you with code examples and such, I thought I'd ask if EuCom
> was on your radar as something you might continue to support. I'm trying
> something
> using ADOX and can't get a simple example to work.
It's not something I work on regularly, but at least partly because few
people use it, and for those who do, it has apparently been sufficient.
I don't have a lot of time right now, so I can't say how quickly I'd be
able to support anything.
Matt
2. RE: Matt...EuCom...again
Matt Lewis wrote:
> It's not something I work on regularly, but at least partly because few
> people use it, and for those who do, it has apparently been sufficient.
It's a shame that more people don't use EuCom. There's quite a few things that
we could add to Windows programs through COM that aren't accessible other wise.
If I had your level of knowledge I'd even take up the library support
myself...but I don't.
Jonas Temple
http://www.innovativesys.net
3. RE: Matt...EuCom...again
Hmm.. maybe it's time to stop lurking and get helpful again.
I'm developing for COM all the time: in Delphi, C++ and,
can you believe it, MASM32.
Trouble is, I just don't have a lot of time to do Euphoria
anymore. Sequences are still the best thing since sliced
bread, but there's more to life than sequences. For me
there's writing standard DLLs and COM DLLs and dealing daily
with the intricacies of converting from one character
encoding to another. Who here knows anything about Arabic7
encoding?
We’re still some way from a production system, but
http://www.protiumblue.com is where the next you-beaut
programming language is coming from.
Anyway, I'll take another look at euCOM. Maybe there's
something I can do with it in my ample spare time (NOT).
Kind regards,
Bruce.
Bruce M. Axtens
Software Engineer
Strapper Technologies
