1. Re: code reviews
On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, you wrote:
> Excellent. This is exactly what is required. I'm assuming you are concerned
> about the performance of win32lib. I'll update the file with these
> improvements plus a few other similar ones. As for the overheads (comments,
> whitespace, long names,etc), I'm thinking we'll release two variants of the
> library - one fully commented and "beautified", and one stripped down
> version. Does anyone want to submit a utility to minimise a Euphoria source
> file?
Derek:
A quick test shows that adding several hundred lines of comments, and lots of
white space within a timed routine makes less than 1% difference in execution
time. I don't think it's worth the trouble to maintain an "uglyfied" version.
Regards,
Irv
