1. Borland C Compiler
SWIG/Euphoria, the last program I released, was compiled using the free
Borland C compiler. Carlos Valdes reports that when he tried using it, it
complained that it needed the CC3250.DLL. This came as a suprise to me,
since I assumed that it generated stand-alone EXEs. Disappointingly, this is
not the case.
I can't find any documentation on the DLL in the help file, or on the 'Net.
Is there a way of setting the compiler so that it doesn't rely on the DLL?
I'll try to get a fixed copy of SWIG/Euphoria posted soon; apologies to
anyone who had trouble with it.
Thanks!
-- David Cuny
2. Re: Borland C Compiler
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000 00:53:41 -0700, David Cuny <dcuny at LANSET.COM> wrote:
>SWIG/Euphoria, the last program I released, was compiled using the free
>Borland C compiler. Carlos Valdes reports that when he tried using it, it
>complained that it needed the CC3250.DLL. This came as a suprise to me,
>since I assumed that it generated stand-alone EXEs. Disappointingly, this
is
>not the case.
>
>I can't find any documentation on the DLL in the help file, or on the 'Net.
>Is there a way of setting the compiler so that it doesn't rely on the DLL?
>
>I'll try to get a fixed copy of SWIG/Euphoria posted soon; apologies to
>anyone who had trouble with it.
>
David:
That DLL comes with Borland BCC5.5 which is a free compiler download.
http://community.borland.com/article/0,1410,20633,00.html
Bernie
3. Re: Borland C Compiler
Bernie wrote:
> That DLL comes with Borland BCC5.5 which is
> a free compiler download.
I obviously phrased my question poorly. Can I create executables with the
Borland compiler that _do not_ require the DLL? If so, what is the command
line option to the compiler or linker?
Thanks!
-- David Cuny
4. Re: Borland C Compiler
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000 10:30:14 -0700, Cuny, David at DSS <David.Cuny at
DSS.CA.GOV>
wrote:
>I obviously phrased my question poorly. Can I create executables with the
>Borland compiler that _do not_ require the DLL? If so, what is the command
>line option to the compiler or linker?
Couldn't you control that with a make file ?
Bernie
5. Re: Borland C Compiler
- Posted by Al Getz <xaxo at AOL.COM>
Aug 18, 2000
-
Last edited Aug 19, 2000
Its not by chance building a debug version is it?
6. Re: Borland C Compiler
Bernie wrote:
> Couldn't you control [the command line options]
> with a make file ?
Yes, that's what a make file does.
The problem is, I don't know *what* flag to specify to the compiler or
linker. It's enough to drive me into using djgpp again...
-- David Cuny
7. Re: Borland C Compiler
Al Getz wrote:
> Its not by chance building a debug version is it?
It doesn't appear to be, thanks. The flags are
-c -w-
which are compile without link and a warning handler flag.
-- David Cuny
8. Re: Borland C Compiler
On Sat, 19 Aug 2000 08:41:29 -0700, David Cuny <dcuny at LANSET.COM> wrote:
>Bernie wrote:
>
>> Couldn't you control [the command line options]
>> with a make file ?
>
>Yes, that's what a make file does.
>
>The problem is, I don't know *what* flag to specify to the compiler or
>linker. It's enough to drive me into using djgpp again...
>
David:
Goto to the DOS prompt and type BCC32 that will list all options
for the compiler.
Goto to the DOS prompt and type ILINK32 that will list all options
for the linker.
In the COMPILER you can specify LIBRARY directories.
In the LINKER you can specify LIBRARY files.
Can't you just link only the DLL's that you want to use ?
Bernie
