1. irc
- Posted by Kat <gertie at PELL.NET>
Aug 14, 2000
-
Last edited Aug 15, 2000
Umm, i forget who said they made the room on dalnet, but i visited #programEU on
dalnet several times, and no one has been there.
Kat
2. irc
- Posted by Kat <gertie at PELL.NET>
Aug 14, 2000
-
Last edited Aug 15, 2000
On 14 Aug 2000, at 13:03, Alex Ford wrote:
> to kat:
>
> you seem to know so much about mirc... why don't ya come on in #programEU?
> Trust me... no perv will harrase you directly in there... my bot will kick
> them out... heh... er... yea... i kinda took over the channel while i was
> just sitting there waiting for someone to come in.... oh well... i'm a good
> op! really! i fixed that channel up real nice!
>
> ~later~
>
Ah, there is that email ! Don't know how i got "Alex Ford" construed as "Hawke`"
, but
anyhow, i was there, no bot, and no humans either. The net is linked, somewhat,
about as good as dalnet gets, 25 to 29 servers linked (servers on dalnet drop
off all the
time), no pings from chanserv, 16,000 channels with one person in all of them
(unless
they are porn, in which case there are 200 in them.....), etc. Wassup? And why
not a
better irc net? There are faster and more reliable nets out there. It's not like
you need
dalnet, or their reputation or problems, sorcery.net has no porn rooms, for
instance.
Kat
3. Re: irc
i would -consider- (no promises) monitoring a #Euphoria channel
on sorcery net...
ops would be nearly mandatory....(someone has to babysit???)
gasp! could i be trusted? naw ;)
----- Original Message -----
From: Kat <gertie at PELL.NET>
To: <EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU>
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 6:54 PM
Subject: irc
> On 14 Aug 2000, at 13:03, Alex Ford wrote:
>
> > to kat:
> >
> > you seem to know so much about mirc... why don't ya come on in
#programEU?
> > Trust me... no perv will harrase you directly in there... my bot will
kick
> > them out... heh... er... yea... i kinda took over the channel while i
was
> > just sitting there waiting for someone to come in.... oh well... i'm a
good
> > op! really! i fixed that channel up real nice!
> >
> > ~later~
> >
>
> Ah, there is that email ! Don't know how i got "Alex Ford" construed as
"Hawke`" , but
> anyhow, i was there, no bot, and no humans either. The net is linked,
somewhat,
> about as good as dalnet gets, 25 to 29 servers linked (servers on dalnet
drop off all the
> time), no pings from chanserv, 16,000 channels with one person in all of
them (unless
> they are porn, in which case there are 200 in them.....), etc. Wassup? And
why not a
> better irc net? There are faster and more reliable nets out there. It's
not like you need
> dalnet, or their reputation or problems, sorcery.net has no porn rooms,
for instance.
>
> Kat
>
_______________________________________________
Why pay for something you could get for free?
NetZero provides FREE Internet Access and Email
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
4. Re: irc
- Posted by Alex Ford <FFUltimateMaster at CS.COM>
Aug 14, 2000
-
Last edited Aug 15, 2000
to gertie at PELL.NET (Kat):
heh... well... i was there for along time too... several pplz came in while i
was there... i usally take it opon my self to take over the channel, so i'm
usally op with my handy side kick... sorry there was no one there when you
went on... and well... i didn't make it... i just decided to support it...
<grins> i dunno why it wasn't put on another server... if you want, why don't
you set one up? =) I'll help if ya need it...
~later~
5. Re: irc
- Posted by Kat <gertie at PELL.NET>
Aug 14, 2000
-
Last edited Aug 15, 2000
On 14 Aug 2000, at 22:04, Alex Ford wrote:
> to gertie at PELL.NET (Kat):
> heh... well... i was there for along time too... several pplz came in while i
> was there... i usally take it opon my self to take over the channel, so i'm
> usally op with my handy side kick... sorry there was no one there when you
> went on... and well... i didn't make it... i just decided to support it...
> <grins> i dunno why it wasn't put on another server... if you want, why don't
> you set one up? =) I'll help if ya need it...
Why bother to set one up if no one comes in to chat?
On 14 Aug 2000, at 19:03, Hawke' wrote:
> i would -consider- (no promises) monitoring a #Euphoria channel
> on sorcery net...
> ops would be nearly mandatory....(someone has to babysit???)
> gasp! could i be trusted? naw ;)
Well, i have a bot already *officially* registered on several sorcery servers,
altho it's
now a bot-friendly net so you can run a bot on them all now...... oh what the
heck....
-ChanServ:@#Euphoria- (Ops:#Euphoria) kat just registered #Euphoria
on sorcery.net
Kat
6. Re: irc
well, everyone, we are trying really hard now to
keep #Euphoria on Sorcery net staffed...
i'm trying to idle in there as much as i can
if i dont answer immediately, dont fret...
i might just be in another window for a moment :)
say hi to tiggr too :)
_____NetZero Free Internet Access and Email______
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
7. Re: irc
- Posted by gertie at ad-tek.net
Jul 30, 2001
On 30 Jul 2001, at 20:02, martin.stachon at worldonline.cz wrote:
> > Not crazy. I have 3 programs online now, working on multipath irc,
> > redundant/backup links and all that.
>
> You must like the IRC much, you are still talkin about it. Don't you ? ;)
Well, yeas and no. It is *easy* real-time communication, with many abilities and
options, even tho i have no one to communicate with anymore. Seems everyone
wants
to exclude people from life for one reason or another, usually because the other
person
is a little different, and 99.999% of people can't expand their rigidly fixed
mental boxes
to accomodate exception processing in their preconcieved steriotypes, even
online!!
For instance, 10% people often state as a fact that i cannot be typing this
manually,
and then they refuse to talk to me on irc. So, yes, i like the method of irc,
but it is still
populated by (or "infested by", take your pick) humans. The drawback to irc is
the lack
of fault tolerance in the tcp connection. I'm not advocating udp, i'd prefer tcp
and the
original premise of the internet: data will get thru in a timely fashion, no
matter how
many servers are taken down. Sadly, this goal has yet to be realised, especially
on
irc. I am just trying to gather stats on the current protocol's connection
liabilities for
now, but having to stop everything and figure out Windoze is slowing me down a
lot.
Kat
8. irc
- Posted by Kat <KSMiTH at PELL.NET>
Nov 10, 1999
-
Last edited Nov 11, 1999
[21:30] *** Now talking in #cafe
9:30:01pm 11/10/99 Wednesday
. 9:30:01pm 11/10/99 any265197 joined .
. any265197!someone at 208.138.65.230 .
[21:30] *** any265197 is now known as any265197
[21:30] <any265197> ...
[21:30] *** Disconnected
