1. Re: Compiler?? Step 4
- Posted by Mathew Hounsell <mfh03 at UOW.EDU.AU>
Jun 11, 2000
-
Last edited Jun 12, 2000
> Rob Craig writes:
> >>You can see
> >> the original Euphoria statement as a C comment,
> >> followed by the C statements that implement that
> >> Euphoria statement.
>
> Kat writes:
> >Hmm,,, sounds like you'll be giving away the store with that one.
>
> Yes, some very interesting information will be revealed.
> However there is still a lot of information that won't be
> revealed. I think it's worth the risk.
If it can be run on an x86 then it has to be implementable within the x86
instruction set.
There is nothing within Euphoria that can't be reverse engineered.
It would just take a while longer to implement the optimisations Euphoria does.
It is very difficult to compete in a market full of GNU Software and Freeware.
-------------------------
Sincerely,
Mathew Hounsell
mat.hounsell at excite.com
