1. Re: compiler?? step 4
On 7 Jun 2000, at 21:42, Robert Craig wrote:
> Nic (RedWord)Smith writes:
> > Rob, a quick question I haven't noticed
> > brought up before: Will the code generated by the
> > Euphoria "compiler" be in "good form", human editable,
> > unreadable, or obfusicated/shrouded somehow?
>
> The C code coming out right now is human readable,
> with the same variable and routine names as
> the Euphoria program. Extra temp variables
> are used where needed, and all control-flow
> constructs are reduced to goto's.
Oh goodie, goto's!! 
)
Can we use them in the Eu code before compiling too?
>You can see
> the original Euphoria statement as a C comment,
> followed by the C statements that implement that
> Euphoria statement.
Hmm,,, sounds like you'll be giving away the store with that one.
Kat
