1. Re: compiler?? step 4
- Posted by Andy Cranston <Andy.Cranston at EUPHONY.CO.UK> Jun 06, 2000
- 464 views
-----Original Message----- From: CenSe [mailto:cense at MAIL.RU] Sent: 06 June 2000 01:55 To: EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU Subject: compiler?? step 4 <SNIP> Step 4: Every un*x machine has a C compiler. maybe ms should take the hint. Compilers are a good thing because they allow smaller downloads and promote free software. Also, compiling is quite easy when you use config and make files. two or three commands and its done. I think free distribution of code to compile is a great idea and if someone is so lazy the he/she does not want to compile free software than they should not bother with it and stick with MS and affiliates(ie Adobe, etc.) products. <SNIP> Every un*x machine has a C compiler *available* but whether it is available on a particular host or not depends... Some C compilers for UNIX are separately purchased products - I think that the C compiler for Solaris is like this. Others are not part of the base installation UNIX but can be loaded after the initial install - AIX version 3 was like this if I recall correctly. Others still give you a non-ANSI compliant compiler by default (e.g. HP-UX) but you can purchase an ANSI compliant C compiler if you want to. The good news is that most un*x can run the GNU gcc compiler which is ANSI compliant and totally freeCompiling software can be daunting for the casual user but I totally agree that well crafted configuration and make files can make the process very straightforward. I do think that to get more people using free software we all need to put in effort to make compiling the software as simple as possible. Regards, Andy Cranston.