1. How about Gnuporhia - was PEU CVS
Not complaining... just suggesting :) :) :)
not sure what the LGPL is... but if you consider the
GNU PL how about seeing if David Cuny will let you use
Gnuphoria :) :) :) :)
--- jbrown1050 at hotpop.com wrote:
>
> Hope no one complains, PEU is now Portable Enhanced
> Uphoria.
>
> Considering putting it under the LGPL license. (May
> use Llama License,
> a BSD-derived license, instead.)
>
> Oh, almost forgot, PEU now has CVS. Gonna update the
> web site soon.
>
> jbrown
>
>
>
>
>
>
2. Re: How about Gnuporhia - was PEU CVS
Gnuporhia ?
I hope it's not the drug-resistant strain :)
3. Re: How about Gnuporhia - was PEU CVS
Irv wrote:
> Gnuporhia ?
Try "Gnuphoria". And yes, it *does* sound like an STD. 
jbrown wrote:
> Hope no one complains, PEU is now Portable Enhanced Uphoria.
No offense, but IMNSHO that's *terrible*. How can it be "Enhance Uphoria"=
if=20
there's no "Uphoria"? At least "Pete's Euphoria" had some sort of meaning=
=2E
Out of deference to Robert, it would be best to drop the word "Euphoria" =
from=20
the name (or derived name) so that there's no confusion.
> Considering putting it under the LGPL license. (May use Llama=20
> License, a BSD-derived license, instead.)
I can't tell what licence Pete intended to put it under. It *looks* like =
it's=20
under the Public Domain. In sticking with that spirit, you probably shoul=
d go=20
with the BSD license.
-- David Cuny
4. Re: How about Gnuporhia - was PEU CVS
On 0, Ken Rhodes <ken_rhodes30436 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Not complaining... just suggesting :) :) :)
>
> not sure what the LGPL is... but if you consider the
> GNU PL how about seeing if David Cuny will let you use
> Gnuphoria :) :) :) :)
>
What is that?
jbrown
> --- jbrown1050 at hotpop.com wrote:
> >
> > Hope no one complains, PEU is now Portable Enhanced
> > Uphoria.
> >
> > Considering putting it under the LGPL license. (May
> > use Llama License,
> > a BSD-derived license, instead.)
> >
> > Oh, almost forgot, PEU now has CVS. Gonna update the
> > web site soon.
> >
> > jbrown
> >
> >
5. Re: How about Gnuporhia - was PEU CVS
Before Pete wrote Peu, I decided to take a crack at it. My program was ca=
lled=20
"Gnuphoria", on account that it would be released under GPL.
There were a lot of problems with Gnuphoria. Since sequences can move aro=
und=20
in memory, I used this arcane scheme of blocks which held the addresses. =
The=20
upper byte of the handle referred to the block the byte was stored in, an=
d=20
the lower byte was the index into the block.
Of course, all I really needed to do was allocate space in memory for a=20
structure that held the address of the sequence; something like:
struct Seq {
void *address; /* points to the structure */
...
}
It just got worse from there. I got some basic stuff working - sequences,=
=20
simple control structures - but Pete's code far outstripped mine.
That was fine with me, since I was really hating C coding anyway. So I dr=
opped=20
my project. I can't recally why Pete eventually dropped Peu, though...
-- David Cuny
6. Re: How about Gnuporhia - was PEU CVS
On 0, David Cuny <dcuny at LANSET.COM> wrote:
>
> Before Pete wrote Peu, I decided to take a crack at it. My program was called
> "Gnuphoria", on account that it would be released under GPL.
>
Finally! At last I know! :)
>
> That was fine with me, since I was really hating C coding anyway. So I dropped
>
> my project. I can't recally why Pete eventually dropped Peu, though...
>
> -- David Cuny
>
Pete dropped his because the coding became too complex (he told me this
himself).
While Pete's code may be useful, a total rewrite will probably be done sometime
soon, for obvious reasons.
jbrown
7. Re: How about Gnuporhia - was PEU CVS
On 0, David Cuny <dcuny at LANSET.COM> wrote:
> Irv wrote:
>
> > Gnuporhia ?
>
> Try "Gnuphoria". And yes, it *does* sound like an STD.
>
Lol. Seriously, what is it? (Derek Parnell told me it may have been eu.ex, the
Euphoria interpreter in Euphoria, is that correct?)
> jbrown wrote:
>
> > Hope no one complains, PEU is now Portable Enhanced Uphoria.
>
> No offense, but IMNSHO that's *terrible*. How can it be "Enhance Uphoria" if
> there's no "Uphoria"? At least "Pete's Euphoria" had some sort of meaning.
Actually, it was Portable EUphoria before. But good point.
>
> Out of deference to Robert, it would be best to drop the word "Euphoria" from
> the name (or derived name) so that there's no confusion.
>
Hmm ... you may be right. This is a topic of debate within the PEU team atm.
(Maybe I'll just drop everything else and call it Uphoria ... joking.)
> > Considering putting it under the LGPL license. (May use Llama
> > License, a BSD-derived license, instead.)
>
> I can't tell what licence Pete intended to put it under. It *looks* like it's
> under the Public Domain. In sticking with that spirit, you probably should go
> with the BSD license.
>
> -- David Cuny
Its currently under the Llama License (which is BSD-derivade, actually, but
slightly more GPL-like), also considering LGPL and GPL. Again, a topic of
debate.
jbrown
