1. Re: Open Source Exu
jbrown wrote:
> On 0, phil long <tinstaafl at attbi.com> wrote:
> > I like the idea of an open-source EXU. So long as the folks who work on
> > it haven't seen Rob's code (or maybe even if they have, if Rob OKs it),
> > there wouldn't be any copyright violations, and I don't think Rob has
> > any patents on his code. I, for one, have been champing at the bit to
> > port EU to CYGWIN, a U**X-y port of the FSF tools to WinX platforms, but
> > with a layoff in the offing and no raise this year, I can't scratch
> > together the bucks for the source. Doing the entire job by oneself is
> > daunting, but as the open-source community has discovered, many coding
> > hands makes for lighter work for all. Better yet, if the 'maintainer'
> > gets tired of the job, he can always hand it off to somebody else; best
> > of all, as with any open-source project, anybody could maintain his own
> > personal version. Are you putting together an open-source effort?
> >
> > thx, phil long
> >
>
> Basicly, I hope to start one. I'm mostly coding on my own these first few
> days
> (err.. day), but eventually, yes, I do hope to start an open-source
> effort.
>
> Everyone is welcome to join, but beware, we're talking about major C
> coding
> here.
>
> Also, be sure to thank Pete Erblein, I'm using his Peu v. 0.12.2 as a
> starting point.
I've got my own messy PEU (most of it done in May) :
http://www.webpark.cz/stachon/en
http://www.webpark.cz/stachon/files/notes.txt
also at : http://eberlein.org/euphoria/
Martin
