1. Ping Rob - bug in shroud -clear
- Posted by petelomax at blueyonder.co.uk Nov 13, 2002
- 446 views
{{{ Rob, I have found a bug in shroud:
if file inc.e is just:
integer a
and file inc.exw is:
include inc.e integer a a1 procedure x() for B1 to 10 do a+B end for end procedure x()
Shrouding it gives: integer a integer B B=1 procedure x() for B=1 to 10 do B+=B end for end procedure x()
The shrouder correctly avoids the name clash if the procedure is removed.
I'll just rename my variable so the shrouder doesn't have to, for now.
Pete
2. Re: Ping Rob - bug in shroud -clear
- Posted by Robert Craig <rds at RapidEuphoria.com> Nov 13, 2002
- 432 views
Pete Lomax writes: <example of bug in shroud -clear> Thanks, I'll fix it. It works ok in the case where you don't choose the "-clear" option. Regards, Rob Craig Rapid Deployment Software http://www.RapidEuphoria.com
3. Re: Ping Rob - bug in shroud -clear
- Posted by petelomax at blueyonder.co.uk Nov 13, 2002
- 436 views
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 16:40:25 -0500, Robert Craig <rds at RapidEuphoria.com> wrote: >======== The Euphoria Mailing List ======== > >Pete Lomax writes: ><example of bug in shroud -clear> > >Thanks, I'll fix it. >It works ok in the case where >you don't choose the "-clear" option. No rush. But... while you are there, I also had: include routines.e global integer .... come out as: end functionglobal integer which I had to manually add a blank line for. Again, no big deal. Pete
4. Re: Ping Rob - bug in shroud -clear
- Posted by Robert Craig <rds at RapidEuphoria.com> Nov 13, 2002
- 437 views
Pete Lomax writes: > But... while you are there, I also had: > include routines.e > global integer .... > > come out as: > end functionglobal integer Ok, thanks, I'll look into it. Regards, Rob Craig Rapid Deployment Software http://www.RapidEuphoria.com