1. Question: What .dlls would be useful?
Just something that popped into my head to help me learn more about
programming.
I know the standard Win GUI, etc. .dlls are pretty extensive, but are
there other .dlls that don't currently exist that would be useful to Eu?
Or maybe a better way to ask this question: Where are some areas that Eu
is slow/has less functionality that a .dll (or whatever Linux uses -
.so?) could speed it up or make Eu more useful?
2. Re: Question: What .dlls would be useful?
> > SR.Williamson wrote:
> > > Just something that popped into my head to help me learn more about
> > > programming.
> > >
> > > I know the standard Win GUI, etc. .dlls are pretty extensive, but are
> > > there other .dlls that don't currently exist that would be useful to
Eu?
> > >
> > > Or maybe a better way to ask this question: Where are some areas that
Eu
> > >
> > > is slow/has less functionality that a .dll (or whatever Linux uses -
> > > .so?) could speed it up or make Eu more useful?
>
> A way to execute strings as programs? Can you DLLize one of the
> interpreters in the archives, and can the exec_str() function/procedure
pass
> to the DLL and recieve back the appropriate vars to exec the string?
>
> How about threads?
>
> Kat
DLL cannot access Euphoria's variables,
(maybe after heavy hacking of Euphoria's memory block ;)
so it would can only do the same as call_function & some eval()
Martin
