1. My contributions.

------=_NextPart_000_000F_01BF945C.2CD7B760
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I haven't heard anything about my contributions on the list, nor have I =
seen my files posted to the Recent User Contribs page, so I assume that =
the list did not receive my post(s) about my updates to my compiled =
refman and my record.e library.  Please respond to this to let me know =
of the status of my contributions.
Thank you.
+-----------------------+
| Adam Weeden   |
| adam_weeden@ |
|       hotmail.com |
| AIM : DJMu2000 |
| ICQ : 67737992  |
+------------------------+

------=_NextPart_000_000F_01BF945C.2CD7B760
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.3013.2600" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I haven't heard anything about my =
contributions on=20
the list, nor have I seen my files posted to the Recent User Contribs =
page, so I=20
assume that the list did not receive my post(s) about my updates to my =
compiled=20
refman and my record.e library.&nbsp; Please respond to this to let me =
know of=20
the status of my contributions.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thank you.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>+-----------------------+<BR>| Adam=20
Weeden&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;|<BR>|=20
adam_weeden@&nbsp;|<BR>|&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; hotmail.com =

|<BR>|&nbsp;AIM : DJMu2000 |</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>| ICQ : 67737992&nbsp;=20

------=_NextPart_000_000F_01BF945C.2CD7B760--

new topic     » topic index » view message » categorize

2. Re: My contributions.

i recieved the following, this is the first i got to email in hours, .....

Kat


----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Weeden" <adam_weeden at HOTMAIL.COM>
To: <EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU>
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 11:10 PM
Subject: My contributions.


I haven't heard anything about my contributions on the list, nor have I seen
my files posted to the Recent User Contribs page, so I assume that the list
did not receive my post(s) about my updates to my compiled refman and my
record.e library.  Please respond to this to let me know of the status of my
contributions.
Thank you.
+-----------------------+
| Adam Weeden   |
| adam_weeden@ |
|       hotmail.com |
| AIM : DJMu2000 |
| ICQ : 67737992  |
+------------------------+

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

3. Re: My contributions.

Adam Weeden writes:
> I haven't heard anything about my contributions on the list,
> nor have I seen my files posted to the Recent User Contribs page,
> so I assume that the list did not receive my post(s) about my
> updates to my compiled refman and my record.e library.
> Please respond to this to let me know of the status of my
> contributions.

Sorry about that.
I'll stamp record.e and post it to Recent User Contributions
later today.

In general it's safer if you send contributions to me directly
at rds at attcanada.net. With all the messages on this list,
it's easy for me to lose track of things. I use Inbox Assistant
to move mailing list messages into a separate folder.

Regards,
   Rob Craig
   Rapid Deployment Software
   http://www.RapidEuphoria.com

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

4. Re: My contributions.

At 12:14 AM 3/23/00 -0600, you wrote:
>i recieved the following, this is the first i got to email in hours, .....
>
>Kat
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Adam Weeden" <adam_weeden at HOTMAIL.COM>
>To: <EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU>
>Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 11:10 PM
>Subject: My contributions.
>
>
>I haven't heard anything about my contributions on the list, nor have I seen
>my files posted to the Recent User Contribs page, so I assume that the list
>did not receive my post(s) about my updates to my compiled refman and my
>record.e library.  Please respond to this to let me know of the status of my
>contributions.
>Thank you.
>+-----------------------+
>| Adam Weeden   |
>| adam_weeden@ |
>|       hotmail.com |
>| AIM : DJMu2000 |
>| ICQ : 67737992  |
>+------------------------+
>
     Well after writing a few procedures so that record.e can run with
  Euphoria 2.0 , I tried this ; and found that your software was doing a
  lot of disk accessing.
    Perhaps this is usual if you have a limited capacity computer, however
  one might think that your software could work with any size record.
    A bit more explanation , in your software , may assist.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

5. Re: My contributions.

>      Well after writing a few procedures so that record.e can run with
>   Euphoria 2.0 , I tried this ; and found that your software was doing a
>   lot of disk accessing.
>     Perhaps this is usual if you have a limited capacity computer, however
>   one might think that your software could work with any size record.
>     A bit more explanation , in your software , may assist.

Really nothing to explain, my include doesn't use any direct disk access
using open() or anything like that.  It does use allocate, peek, and poke,
which as you stated previously on a low end machine (or one running under a
MSDOS prompt under windows) will tend to use the swap file on the disk.  One
way to possibly avoid this problem is you could change all of the the
allocates in my include to allocate_low, and change all the frees into
free_lows.

Adam Weeden
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

6. Re: My contributions.

--=====================_954188259==_

At 12:48 PM 3/26/00 EST, you wrote:
>>      Well after writing a few procedures so that record.e can run with
>>   Euphoria 2.0 , I tried this ; and found that your software was doing a
>>   lot of disk accessing.
>>     Perhaps this is usual if you have a limited capacity computer, however
>>   one might think that your software could work with any size record.
>>     A bit more explanation , in your software , may assist.
>
>Really nothing to explain, my include doesn't use any direct disk access
>using open() or anything like that.  It does use allocate, peek, and poke,
>which as you stated previously on a low end machine (or one running under a
>MSDOS prompt under windows) will tend to use the swap file on the disk.  One
>way to possibly avoid this problem is you could change all of the the
>allocates in my include to allocate_low, and change all the frees into
>free_lows.
>
>Adam Weeden
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
   I found that your file  rectest.ex , using the include file record.e,
  runs fine on my system ; using Euphoria 2.0 , after I wrote a little more
  code.  See in2.txt.

P.S.  You may receive this same msg @HOTMAIL , I get too many non-specific
     msg's from the list server and I may quit this at some point.

--=====================_954188259==_

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu