1. My contributions.
- Posted by Adam Weeden <adam_weeden at HOTMAIL.COM> Mar 23, 2000
- 559 views
------=_NextPart_000_000F_01BF945C.2CD7B760 charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I haven't heard anything about my contributions on the list, nor have I = seen my files posted to the Recent User Contribs page, so I assume that = the list did not receive my post(s) about my updates to my compiled = refman and my record.e library. Please respond to this to let me know = of the status of my contributions. Thank you. +-----------------------+ | Adam Weeden | | adam_weeden@ | | hotmail.com | | AIM : DJMu2000 | | ICQ : 67737992 | +------------------------+ ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01BF945C.2CD7B760 charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" = http-equiv=3DContent-Type> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.3013.2600" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I haven't heard anything about my = contributions on=20 the list, nor have I seen my files posted to the Recent User Contribs = page, so I=20 assume that the list did not receive my post(s) about my updates to my = compiled=20 refman and my record.e library. Please respond to this to let me = know of=20 the status of my contributions.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thank you.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>+-----------------------+<BR>| Adam=20 Weeden |<BR>|=20 adam_weeden@ |<BR>| hotmail.com = |<BR>| AIM : DJMu2000 |</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>| ICQ : 67737992 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01BF945C.2CD7B760--
2. Re: My contributions.
- Posted by Kat <gertie at ZEBRA.NET> Mar 23, 2000
- 522 views
i recieved the following, this is the first i got to email in hours, ..... Kat ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Weeden" <adam_weeden at HOTMAIL.COM> To: <EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU> Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 11:10 PM Subject: My contributions. I haven't heard anything about my contributions on the list, nor have I seen my files posted to the Recent User Contribs page, so I assume that the list did not receive my post(s) about my updates to my compiled refman and my record.e library. Please respond to this to let me know of the status of my contributions. Thank you. +-----------------------+ | Adam Weeden | | adam_weeden@ | | hotmail.com | | AIM : DJMu2000 | | ICQ : 67737992 | +------------------------+
3. Re: My contributions.
- Posted by Robert Craig <rds at ATTCANADA.NET> Mar 23, 2000
- 519 views
Adam Weeden writes: > I haven't heard anything about my contributions on the list, > nor have I seen my files posted to the Recent User Contribs page, > so I assume that the list did not receive my post(s) about my > updates to my compiled refman and my record.e library. > Please respond to this to let me know of the status of my > contributions. Sorry about that. I'll stamp record.e and post it to Recent User Contributions later today. In general it's safer if you send contributions to me directly at rds at attcanada.net. With all the messages on this list, it's easy for me to lose track of things. I use Inbox Assistant to move mailing list messages into a separate folder. Regards, Rob Craig Rapid Deployment Software http://www.RapidEuphoria.com
4. Re: My contributions.
- Posted by bfurniss <bfurniss at IHUG.CO.NZ> Mar 24, 2000
- 577 views
At 12:14 AM 3/23/00 -0600, you wrote: >i recieved the following, this is the first i got to email in hours, ..... > >Kat > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Adam Weeden" <adam_weeden at HOTMAIL.COM> >To: <EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU> >Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 11:10 PM >Subject: My contributions. > > >I haven't heard anything about my contributions on the list, nor have I seen >my files posted to the Recent User Contribs page, so I assume that the list >did not receive my post(s) about my updates to my compiled refman and my >record.e library. Please respond to this to let me know of the status of my >contributions. >Thank you. >+-----------------------+ >| Adam Weeden | >| adam_weeden@ | >| hotmail.com | >| AIM : DJMu2000 | >| ICQ : 67737992 | >+------------------------+ > Well after writing a few procedures so that record.e can run with Euphoria 2.0 , I tried this ; and found that your software was doing a lot of disk accessing. Perhaps this is usual if you have a limited capacity computer, however one might think that your software could work with any size record. A bit more explanation , in your software , may assist.
5. Re: My contributions.
- Posted by Adam Weeden <adam_weeden at HOTMAIL.COM> Mar 26, 2000
- 547 views
> Well after writing a few procedures so that record.e can run with > Euphoria 2.0 , I tried this ; and found that your software was doing a > lot of disk accessing. > Perhaps this is usual if you have a limited capacity computer, however > one might think that your software could work with any size record. > A bit more explanation , in your software , may assist. Really nothing to explain, my include doesn't use any direct disk access using open() or anything like that. It does use allocate, peek, and poke, which as you stated previously on a low end machine (or one running under a MSDOS prompt under windows) will tend to use the swap file on the disk. One way to possibly avoid this problem is you could change all of the the allocates in my include to allocate_low, and change all the frees into free_lows. Adam Weeden ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
6. Re: My contributions.
- Posted by bfurniss <bfurniss at IHUG.CO.NZ> Mar 27, 2000
- 565 views
--=====================_954188259==_ At 12:48 PM 3/26/00 EST, you wrote: >> Well after writing a few procedures so that record.e can run with >> Euphoria 2.0 , I tried this ; and found that your software was doing a >> lot of disk accessing. >> Perhaps this is usual if you have a limited capacity computer, however >> one might think that your software could work with any size record. >> A bit more explanation , in your software , may assist. > >Really nothing to explain, my include doesn't use any direct disk access >using open() or anything like that. It does use allocate, peek, and poke, >which as you stated previously on a low end machine (or one running under a >MSDOS prompt under windows) will tend to use the swap file on the disk. One >way to possibly avoid this problem is you could change all of the the >allocates in my include to allocate_low, and change all the frees into >free_lows. > >Adam Weeden >______________________________________________________ >Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com > I found that your file rectest.ex , using the include file record.e, runs fine on my system ; using Euphoria 2.0 , after I wrote a little more code. See in2.txt. P.S. You may receive this same msg @HOTMAIL , I get too many non-specific msg's from the list server and I may quit this at some point. --=====================_954188259==_