1. Unix version (was: Garbage and macros)
- Posted by Jacques Guy <j.guy at TRL.TELSTRA.COM.AU> Feb 16, 1998
- 675 views
Cameron Kaiser wrote: > Waiting for the Unix version ... Me, I can very well do with Euphoria as she (it's a "she", the word is) as she stands now. However, I am EAGERLY waiting for a Linux version (not XWindows please). I have had Linux sitting on a partition of my PC, idle, because I don't have a nice language to program in under Linux.
2. Re: Unix version (was: Garbage and macros)
- Posted by Monty King <boot_me at GEOCITIES.COM> Feb 15, 1998
- 688 views
- Last edited Feb 16, 1998
However, I am EAGERLY waiting for a >Linux version (not XWindows please). Was wondering how come not Xwindows? I have >had Linux sitting on a partition of my PC, >idle, because I don't have a nice language >to program in under Linux. I have debian linux I think...Not sure if I want to install it though.
3. Re: Unix version (was: Garbage and macros)
- Posted by Jacques Guy <j.guy at TRL.TELSTRA.COM.AU> Feb 16, 1998
- 661 views
Monty King asks: >> [me:] However, I am EAGERLY waiting for a > >Linux version (not XWindows please). > Was wondering how come not Xwindows? Because I object to the overhead imposed by a graphics interface. All the stuff I write is very sparse (usually) statistical or quantitative linguistics algorithms, typically 30K of executable code. It all runs at the DOS prompt and when I want a proper user interface, I write it from scratch to minimize the hassle of input. What runs at a DOS prompt will run under Windoze anyway. But not the other way around. So a compiler that imposes on me a graphics interface is unwelcome. That is what kept me from taking up Oberon/F or POW Oberon, which both require Windows. Changing the interface to what I want it to do is just too much hassle. It is faster and more efficient (to me) to write from scratch.
4. Re: Unix version (was: Garbage and macros)
- Posted by Irv Mullins <irv at ELLIJAY.COM> Feb 16, 1998
- 683 views
At 07:29 PM 2/15/98 -0800, you wrote: >I have debian linux I think...Not sure if I want to install it though. > Go ahead, you can install it on a partition of your hard drive, and still use dos as usual. You boot Linux with a boot floppy (takes just a second or two). Caution: get a really good book on Un*x or Linux before you start. The Un*x guys are bad about naming commands and files and such strangely. For example, a command named DIR is likely named that way because it was written by Dave, Irv and Ralf, and the command erases all your files. (They love to do stuff like that). Irv ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- Congress is good at two things: Passing laws, and passing gas. They put numbers on the laws so we can tell the difference. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------