1. RE: ed.ex / non-gui editors - survey
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Rhodes [mailto:ken_rhodes30436 at yahoo.com]
> I am interested in knowing how many of you (us) use
> ed.ex, or any modified version.
I've been using David Cuny's ee.ex for ages, with no complaints (except that
I can't compile it, since I don't have Watcom--DOS mouse issue).
> Do you think it would be worth Rob's effort to enhance
> ed.ex just to make it a better more elaborate example
> of Euphoria's power?
Not really, although it might make sense to have a prominent link on the web
page to IDE/editors written in and for Euphoria. This could be a big help
to newbies [esp to programming in general] who often are confused about what
tools are necessary for developing apps. Rob could mention this resource in
the docs. Given the editors out there, I think that there are better things
for Rob to focus on.
Matt Lewis
2. RE: ed.ex / non-gui editors - survey
Ken Rhodes wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I am interested in knowing how many of you (us) use
> ed.ex, or any modified version.
>
> Does anyone feel it is worth Robert's time and effort
> to update ed.ex with features that make it more
> powerful and easy to use; if so - what features would
> you like to see implemented?
>
> Do you think it would be worth Rob's effort to enhance
> ed.ex just to make it a better more elaborate example
> of Euphoria's power?
>
> Your comments will be appreciated. Feel free to
> respond to me directly if you wish.
>
> Thanks,
> Ken Rhodes
> ken_rhodes30436 at yahoo.com
>
>
hi Ken
i do use ed.ex and try other editors. but i feel i pressure myself by
coding and running code right away, lots of bugs then.
i currently use another program , ActionOutline to work on my ideas.
as the name says, i create outlines which i easily break down into
functions and procedures, as well as the writing the main loop.
it can export in such a manner that the euphoria interpreter can use.
a feature i would request is: outline style editor that has a library
or dictionary to pull previous works from.
thanks
rudy
lotterywars
3. RE: ed.ex / non-gui editors - survey
Ken Rhodes wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I am interested in knowing how many of you (us) use
> ed.ex, or any modified version.
CyrekSoft's EE editor is much better even if it has a few
minor bugs. It is better for programming because it list subroutines
and can allow you to jump back and forth between subs. Can do
search and replace, work on multiple files, use the clipboard
to transfer code back and forth between Windows and Dos, go to
a particular line number, and etc. Now if Carl would only get
some time to correct those bugs.
Bernie
