1. RE: Euphorian conspiracy, is it a myth?
I admit I don't vote every month... but if RDS would send me a reminder
email I would!!! It's their fault, you know.
Plus, you can vote for yourself... and probably buy votes... so, to the most
diligent goes the free EUPHORIA.
2. RE: Euphorian conspiracy, is it a myth?
I thought that updating the vote statistics was a fairly manual process for RDS,
so theoretically,
Robert should know who voted for what anyhow.
----
Derek.
21/11/2001 4:52:17 PM, "C. K. Lester" <cklester at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>I admit I don't vote every month... but if RDS would send me a reminder
>email I would!!! It's their fault, you know.
>
>Plus, you can vote for yourself... and probably buy votes... so, to the most
>diligent goes the free EUPHORIA.
>
>
>
>
3. RE: Euphorian conspiracy, is it a myth?
Rob,
I would really, REALLY appreciate a monthly reminder that a new voting
month is coming, even if just to members of this list.
Rod Jackson
Robert Craig wrote:
> The Euphoria MicroEconomy is obviously very subjective,
> just like most things in life - your performance evaluation at work,
> the voting for the Academy awards etc. etc. 
> but I think it is somewhat in line with reality,
> and serves a useful purpose.
>
> As far as I can tell there is no cheating going on -
> no voting for oneself, no trading of votes.
>
> I wish more registered users would vote each month,
> but I don't want to keep soliciting people to do so.
> I don't mind at all giving up $3, which is just a discount,
> not real money anyway. I'd make the amount even higher
> but then I'd probably need a more secure system.
> I have to admit that most files are worth a lot more to me
> in terms of increased registrations, than the amount of
> MicroEconomy money they've earned.
>
> Registered users can vote here:
> http://www.rapideuphoria.com/ecoform.htm
>
> Regards,
> Rob Craig
> Rapid Deployment Software
> http://www.RapidEuphoria.com
>
>
4. RE: Euphorian conspiracy, is it a myth?
I must disagree here.
I think shrouded code--even completely bound programs--should be just as
eligible as unshrouded code. Maybe they can have a limit on how much you
can give them per person per month, but I still think it's fair. If
someone wrote a Euphoria game that took off like SimCity, does the
author deserve a free upgrade? IMVHO, yes, even if the program is bound.
(Now, you raise an interesting point, that shrouded code may not even be
true original Euphoria code, but I would think that that is a seperate
issue, and so should be addressed--and if necessary prevented--via
another route.)
Rod Jackson
euman at bellsouth.net wrote:
> Here's one for ya Rob,
>
> If I take an assembled .com program and use a tool created by Davi
> Figueiredo
> to include the program as an .e file then turn around and shroud that
> code and submit it, does this make it euphoria code and should I feel
> guilt if someone
> were to vote on this....
>
> I would vote if given the opportunity to not allow shrouded code to be
> eligible for
> votes... shrouded code does no-one any justice, does it? Not really fair
> to those
> who do put time and energy into submitting code that is actually
> readable.
>
> Since I dont have that right and its not my site its only my opinion I
> submit.
>
> Although, there are a few of us that can read that shrouded code!!! 
>
> Euman
> euman at bellsouth.net
>
>
5. RE: Euphorian conspiracy, is it a myth?
Thanks Rob.
Robert Craig wrote:
> OK, I'll set up an automated monthly message to
> this list, with a MicroEconomy reminder and some other
> information, Web links etc. I'll look into it after I get 2.3 alpha out.
6. RE: Euphorian conspiracy, is it a myth?
Rod Jackson wrote:
> Thanks Rob.
>
> Robert Craig wrote:
> > OK, I'll set up an automated monthly message to
> > this list, with a MicroEconomy reminder and some other
> > information, Web links etc. I'll look into it after I get 2.3 alpha out.
>
>
Hello Craig,
Could you tell me more about the up comming 2.3 version.
Thank's.
