1. Question for RDS
Hi,
Does Euphoria in any way intercept calls to routines in Windows DLLs, in
particular RegisterClassEx or CreateWindowEx, or does it let calls pass
thru untouched?
The reason I ask is because, when I used to program using Watcom C/C++ and
used the style "WS_CAPTION | WS_POPUP | WS_BORDER", I would get a window
without a System Menu Button, without Min/Max buttons and with a disabled
(ie. Grayed) Close button. When I switched to Visual C/C++, using the same
above style I'd get a window without any buttons at all. Now, when I create
a window via Euphoria with a the above style, I get the same type of window
as when programming with Watcom. I know Euphoria is programmed in Watcom,
that's why I'm wondering if Euphoria in any was touches certain calls.
Thanks in advance,
David Guy
2. Re: Question for RDS
Maybe it's the definition of the constants in the window header file.
Did You ever try playing with or using the actual numbers that are
represented the constants. How about printing the constants in VC++
and comparing them with Euphoria and Watcom.
Bernie
by
3. Re: Question for RDS
- Posted by Robert Craig <rds at ATTCANADA.NET>
Jun 29, 1999
-
Last edited Jun 30, 1999
David Guy writes:
> Does Euphoria in any way intercept calls to routines
> in Windows DLLs, in particular RegisterClassEx or
> CreateWindowEx, or does it let calls pass thru untouched?
All calls to C routines pass through untouched.
I can't explain the difference you noticed between
WATCOM C/C++ and Visual C/C++.
Regards,
Rob Craig
Rapid Deployment Software
http://members.aol.com/FilesEu/
