1. wxEuphoria relocation
- Posted by mattlewis (admin) Sep 13, 2011
- 1511 views
I've moved wxEuphoria from subversion to mercurial, still hosted on sourceforge. I'm not sure how many people were following the code. I've updated the SCM page on the wxEuphoria website. Details also below:
Using Mercurial with wxEuphoria
The wxEuphoria project uses Mercurial for source code control. You can take a look at the Sourceforge Mercurial documentation.
Here is the wxEuphoria Mercurial page.
There are three repositories associated with the wxEuphoria project:
- wxeu the main repository of wxEuphoria code
- ide code for wxIDE
- web the creole source code for these web pages
To access the repos, configure your mercurial client accordingly:
- Public Read-Only Access
- http://wxeuphoria.hg.sourceforge.net:8000/hgroot/wxeuphoria/REPONAME (read-only)
- wxEuphoria Developer Read-Write Access
- ssh://USERNAME@wxeuphoria.hg.sourceforge.net/hgroot/wxeuphoria/REPONAME (read/write)
Matt
2. Re: wxEuphoria relocation
- Posted by Vinoba Sep 13, 2011
- 1462 views
Matt: I went into the the new repository, and gingerly went into "Bleeding Edge"
There I got cut by something called
libwxeu-17-2011-09-12.zip
The only way my computer will stop bleeding is when I apply the patch called
wxeu-full-win32-0-17-0.zip
preferably in conjunction with another uniquely coded soothing balm called
wxWidgets 2.9.2
Thanks for informing and keep up the good work.
May the patron Saint of computing bless you.
(Is there one?) I haven't found him in the last 25 years.
Perhaps I need a trip to Mercury to get the Widget No 17 and get to him and become Euphoric with my first Million!
3. Re: wxEuphoria relocation
- Posted by mattlewis (admin) Sep 13, 2011
- 1478 views
Matt: I went into the the new repository, and gingerly went into "Bleeding Edge"
There I got cut by something called
libwxeu-17-2011-09-12.zip
The only way my computer will stop bleeding is when I apply the patch called
wxeu-full-win32-0-17-0.zip
preferably in conjunction with another uniquely coded soothing balm called
wxWidgets 2.9.2
LOL. I plan to move to 2.9 when it becomes the stable version. 2.8 is still the stable version, and is supported at least in Debian based package managers as such. Currently, I'm trying to get away from Watcom, as it cannot seem to build anything past 2.8.7. MinGW looks promising. I've managed to build wxWidgets, but need to update the wxEuphoria build system.
Matt
4. Re: wxEuphoria relocation
- Posted by SDPringle Sep 13, 2011
- 1414 views
I've been looking forward to seeing wxWidgets built using MinGW (rather than Watcom) for some time.
5. Re: wxEuphoria relocation
- Posted by Vinoba Sep 13, 2011
- 1405 views
I've been looking forward to seeing wxWidgets built using MinGW (rather than Watcom) for some time.
I second the motion.
6. Re: wxEuphoria relocation
- Posted by ghaberek (admin) Sep 15, 2011
- 1369 views
I've been looking forward to seeing wxWidgets built using MinGW (rather than Watcom) for some time.
I second the motion.
Third'd. There's a lot I could do with the new features of 2.9. Can anyone say Ribbon interface?
-Greg
7. Re: wxEuphoria relocation
- Posted by Vinoba Sep 15, 2011
- 1357 views
......Can anyone say Ribbon interface?
-Greg
Ribbon Interface is impressive. I second the motion
8. Re: wxEuphoria relocation
- Posted by mattlewis (admin) Sep 15, 2011
- 1397 views
......Can anyone say Ribbon interface?
-Greg
Ribbon Interface is impressive. I second the motion
So what are you guys waiting for!
Matt
9. Re: wxEuphoria relocation
- Posted by Vinoba Sep 15, 2011
- 1334 views
......Can anyone say Ribbon interface?
-Greg
Ribbon Interface is impressive. I second the motion
So what are you guys waiting for!
Matt
Even if you said that in anger, frustration or sarcasm, I deserve it. It is just that I am very scared of C language and using the connection functions (they look very simple).
The first suggestion (Widget 2.9) - there my emphasis was really on wxEuphoria version 17 for windows.
The second small project mooted by Greg, looks very simple, but Greg would be the person to implement it.
In general, there is now so much memory available (Windows XP and Windows 7) that I am not worried about the size of the executables, which certainly are significantly smaller than Windows executables compiled under .net and MSVC.
10. Re: wxEuphoria relocation
- Posted by mattlewis (admin) Sep 15, 2011
- 1291 views
So what are you guys waiting for!
Even if you said that in anger, frustration or sarcasm, I deserve it. It is just that I am very scared of C language and using the connection functions (they look very simple).
Sarcasm or jokingly was more like it. Probably should have put in an emoticon.
Matt
11. Re: wxEuphoria relocation
- Posted by euphoric (admin) Sep 15, 2011
- 1294 views
So what are you guys waiting for!
Even if you said that in anger, frustration or sarcasm, I deserve it.
Matt's a real jerk!
No, that's just the infamous MattLewis snarkitude. Or honesty. As in, "I ain't the only programmer in town!" etc. I often have to remind him that I'm a lowly Euphoria programmer, not a C nor C++ programmer, and that it is his baby and I'm just trying to help raise it. :)
12. Re: wxEuphoria relocation
- Posted by euphoric (admin) Sep 15, 2011
- 1276 views
So what are you guys waiting for!
Even if you said that in anger, frustration or sarcasm, I deserve it. It is just that I am very scared of C language and using the connection functions (they look very simple).
Sarcasm or jokingly was more like it. Probably should have put in an emoticon.
Matt
And a question mark. I mean, it was a question.
13. Re: wxEuphoria relocation
- Posted by mattlewis (admin) Sep 15, 2011
- 1310 views
So what are you guys waiting for?!
Even if you said that in anger, frustration or sarcasm, I deserve it. It is just that I am very scared of C language and using the connection functions (they look very simple).
Sarcasm or jokingly was more like it. Probably should have put in an emoticon.
Matt
And a question mark. I mean, it was a question.
Good point. Really called for an interrobang. FTFM
Matt
14. Re: wxEuphoria relocation
- Posted by Vinoba Sep 15, 2011
- 1311 views
- Last edited Sep 16, 2011
Anyway, Guys, I am not at all offended by a well deserved "reprimand" from Matt. This old brain can only learn so much now. I was already 45 when I was absorbing the intricacies of the new IBM PC with 16K memory and started keeping up with the 14 year old genius/nerds - I kept up right up to 6 years ago, except for this darn animal called C and its big brother C++.
15. Re: wxEuphoria relocation
- Posted by petelomax Sep 16, 2011
- 1259 views
Can anyone say Ribbon interface?
Not without wanting to vomit.
OK, so they are very pretty, but easier to use my arse.
Pete
16. Re: wxEuphoria relocation
- Posted by euphoric (admin) Sep 16, 2011
- 1266 views
Can anyone say Ribbon interface?
Not without wanting to vomit.
That was my initial reaction. Well, maybe not that extreme.
I use Word on an almost daily basis, as a developer, not as a casual user. The ribbon interface has decreased my productivity, if affected it at all. (I actually have all versions of Word, from 97 up to 2010, because my clientele has all those and I have to support all of it). I don't think Word 2010 improved on anything from 2007, or 2003 before that, except it seems a bit faster.