1. REPL in Euphoria 4.0.1
- Posted by jimcbrown (admin) Feb 22, 2011
- 1389 views
jaygade accidently committed part of my REPL implementation into the 4.0 branch.
I had committed REPL only in default, before the 4.0/4.1 split, and then promptly forgot about it. So the REPL implementation was only in the 4.1 branch until now.
Now, the question that faces us is this: should we revert the changes, or should we keep them and release REPL in 4.0.1 ?
Cons (against having REPL in 4.0.1):
REPL is a huge paradigm change. REPL has not gone through much testing and is likely to be quite buggy.
Pros (for having REPL in 4.0.1):
I can't think of any.
2. Re: REPL in Euphoria 4.0.1
- Posted by jaygade Feb 22, 2011
- 1339 views
As useful as REPL would be, as a new feature I think that it should remain in 4.1.
Aren't the 4.0.x releases for bugfixes, etc.?
3. Re: REPL in Euphoria 4.0.1
- Posted by mattlewis (admin) Feb 22, 2011
- 1369 views
I had committed REPL only in default, before the 4.0/4.1 split, and then promptly forgot about it. So the REPL implementation was only in the 4.1 branch until now.
Now, the question that faces us is this: should we revert the changes, or should we keep them and release REPL in 4.0.1 ?
REPL is a new feature that should be kept in the 4.1 code base, not in 4.0.
Matt
