1. ver 4.0 ex.err
- Posted by zebra Jan 07, 2011
- 1062 views
When is the error message going to be improved ? First if you use ? 1/0 The error message starts out reporting a divide by zero message which is usless information. Second if you use crash() The error message starts out reporting the tracing all the way from the call to crash inside the include std/error.e In my opinion there should be a way for the programmer to abort or dump or crash the program and dump the trace from the exact point that the abort occurred without all the useless information.
2. Re: ver 4.0 ex.err
- Posted by jimcbrown (admin) Jan 07, 2011
- 1043 views
crash() would make sense as a builtin routine.
I'll take a look to see how much work it is to do this. If it's easy enough, it might make it into 4.0.1
zebra said...
When is the error message going to be improved ? First if you use ? 1/0 The error message starts out reporting a divide by zero message which is usless information. Second if you use crash() The error message starts out reporting the tracing all the way from the call to crash inside the include std/error.e In my opinion there should be a way for the programmer to abort or dump or crash the program and dump the trace from the exact point that the abort occurred without all the useless information.
