1. New build option for Translator
- Posted by jeremy (admin) Apr 30, 2009
- 829 views
- Last edited May 01, 2009
In addition to the new emake.bat, Makefile, Full Makefile and CMake file outputs for the translator (euc), I have just added a direct build feature. I would like if some would test this feature and report back. It's rather simple. Normally, you would translate a program euc myprog.ex and then run either emake.bat or emake, or if using one of the makefiles the appropriate tool would be used to compile the project. Now you can simply do: euc -build myprog.ex. It will not write a build file, makefile or any other generation program but instead will compile your application directly from euc. If you have hello.ex in your current directory and you type euc -build hello.ex when it's done you should have hello.ex and hello.exe (or on Unix simply hello).
Please let me know how this works out for everyone. emake.bat is not going anywhere, but I think this will become the favored option for many/most.
Jeremy
2. Re: New build option for Translator
- Posted by georgeorr Apr 30, 2009
- 830 views
- Last edited May 01, 2009
I tested both on Linux and Windows (Vista) and both worked as you described. This was with release 2014. Seemed pretty clean! Thanks
George
In addition to the new emake.bat, Makefile, Full Makefile and CMake file outputs for the translator (euc), I have just added a direct build feature. I would like if some would test this feature and report back. It's rather simple. Normally, you would translate a program euc myprog.ex and then run either emake.bat or emake, or if using one of the makefiles the appropriate tool would be used to compile the project. Now you can simply do: euc -build myprog.ex. It will not write a build file, makefile or any other generation program but instead will compile your application directly from euc. If you have hello.ex in your current directory and you type euc -build hello.ex when it's done you should have hello.ex and hello.exe (or on Unix simply hello).
Please let me know how this works out for everyone. emake.bat is not going anywhere, but I think this will become the favored option for many/most.
Jeremy
