1. rev 4.0 SVN 1889 Trace is broken
- Posted by bernie Apr 09, 2009
- 891 views
Trace is not displaying properly on WIN98.
2. Re: rev 4.0 SVN 1889 Trace is broken
- Posted by jeremy (admin) Apr 09, 2009
- 896 views
Trace is not displaying properly on WIN98.
Bernie,
Can you please file a bug report and give a little more detail?
Thank you.
Jeremy
3. Re: rev 4.0 SVN 1889 Trace is broken
- Posted by jimcbrown (admin) Apr 09, 2009
- 988 views
Trace is not displaying properly on WIN98.
Bernie,
Can you please file a bug report and give a little more detail?
Thank you.
Jeremy
This has already been filed by lmiller.
As listed on that bug report, can you do a:
c:\> set EUCONS=1
and then report if that improves trace(1) or not?
4. Re: rev 4.0 SVN 1889 Trace is broken
- Posted by DerekParnell (admin) Apr 09, 2009
- 965 views
Trace is not displaying properly on WIN98.
Bernie,
Can you please file a bug report and give a little more detail?
Thank you.
Jeremy
This has already been filed by lmiller.
As listed on that bug report, can you do a:
c:\> set EUCONS=1
and then report if that improves trace(1) or not?
I discovered this a few days ago but thought that it was something I'd done just on my machine. I can now see that it started failing a long time ago. The problem is in the syntax colorization routine. If you use the trace without color it works fine.
I'm working on it now. BTW, it has nothing to do with EUCONS.
5. Re: rev 4.0 SVN 1889 Trace is broken
- Posted by bernie Apr 09, 2009
- 910 views
Trace is not displaying properly on WIN98.
Bernie,
Can you please file a bug report and give a little more detail?
Thank you.
Jeremy
This has already been filed by lmiller.
As listed on that bug report, can you do a:
c:\> set EUCONS=1
and then report if that improves trace(1) or not?
No Jim that doesn't help.
The display looks like it is not get \r and spaces are double. Lines are missing or outside the window.
This has to be fixed as soon as possible or put back the way it use to be set up.
If I remember right; I think this same thing was tried before to have the code adjust the console size automatically and at that time it didn't work.
If this is not working it prevents anybody from being able to debug so it is a top priority to fix otherwise the Euphoria code is useless.
6. Re: rev 4.0 SVN 1889 Trace is broken
- Posted by jeremy (admin) Apr 09, 2009
- 864 views
If this is not working it prevents anybody from being able to debug so it is a top priority to fix otherwise the Euphoria code is useless.
It's on the bug list already. The bug list is the list of things that we work on before making releases.
Jeremy
7. Re: rev 4.0 SVN 1889 Trace is broken
- Posted by DerekParnell (admin) Apr 09, 2009
- 902 views
If this is not working it prevents anybody from being able to debug so it is a top priority to fix otherwise the Euphoria code is useless.
As a workaround for now, use trace(2) instead of trace(1). This forces a plain white-on-black trace listing.
8. Re: rev 4.0 SVN 1889 Trace is broken
- Posted by bernie Apr 09, 2009
- 925 views
If this is not working it prevents anybody from being able to debug so it is a top priority to fix otherwise the Euphoria code is useless.
As a workaround for now, use trace(2) instead of trace(1). This forces a plain white-on-black trace listing.
ok Thanks Derek
9. Re: rev 4.0 SVN 1889 Trace is broken
- Posted by DerekParnell (admin) Apr 09, 2009
- 1061 views
- Last edited Apr 10, 2009
If this is not working it prevents anybody from being able to debug so it is a top priority to fix otherwise the Euphoria code is useless.
As a workaround for now, use trace(2) instead of trace(1). This forces a plain white-on-black trace listing.
ok Thanks Derek
I've just uploaded a fix for this. It is in SVN 1897 so if you or anyone else could confirm that it has actually been repaired, I'd appreciate it.
10. Re: rev 4.0 SVN 1889 Trace is broken
- Posted by bernie Apr 10, 2009
- 922 views
If this is not working it prevents anybody from being able to debug so it is a top priority to fix otherwise the Euphoria code is useless.
As a workaround for now, use trace(2) instead of trace(1). This forces a plain white-on-black trace listing.
ok Thanks Derek
I've just uploaded a fix for this. It is in SVN 1897 so if you or anyone else could confirm that it has actually been repaired, I'd appreciate it.
Thanks Derek:
Tested trace on WIN98 SVN 1899 and trace runs fine.
Thank you very much for fixing it. Bernie
