1. WxEuphoria
- Posted by Andy Nov 30, 2008
- 987 views
- Last edited Dec 01, 2008
Hey Guys,
I was wondering if wxEuphoria was ever going to be updated along with the wxIDE. They haven't been updated in quite awhile. Has there been any work on them latley?
2. Re: WxEuphoria
- Posted by mattlewis (admin) Dec 01, 2008
- 1018 views
Hey Guys,
I was wondering if wxEuphoria was ever going to be updated along with the wxIDE. They haven't been updated in quite awhile. Has there been any work on them latley?
They have been worked on quite a bit since their respective last releases. Most of the time I've had has been devoted to working on euphoria 4.0, lately.
Matt
3. Re: WxEuphoria
- Posted by ghaberek (admin) Dec 01, 2008
- 974 views
I've been doing quite a bit of work to wxEuphoria over the past 6 months or so. All my updates are in the SVN revisions. Everything is stable and should compile without issue (let me know if it doesn't). The documentation is fairly update within the library as well, but there's still lots of little things that are broken and/or missing.
http://wxeuphoria.sourceforge.net/svn.php
I guess (if it's okay with Matt), I can try to get another whole version of the 3.0-compatible library out by the end of the year. Like Matt said, he's been working on a 4.0-compatible library, which is laid out completely different from the 3.0 version. (And if I'm correct in assuming, may be integrated into an interpreter?)
-Greg
4. Re: WxEuphoria
- Posted by mattlewis (admin) Dec 01, 2008
- 942 views
I guess (if it's okay with Matt), I can try to get another whole version of the 3.0-compatible library out by the end of the year.
Yes, if you're willing to put a release together, that would be great!
Like Matt said, he's been working on a 4.0-compatible library, which is laid out completely different from the 3.0 version. (And if I'm correct in assuming, may be integrated into an interpreter?)
This is actually two separate issues. I started working on making a more 4.0-ish library that relies more on namespaces, and I think produces cleaner looking code in applications. Of course, it will break a lot of stuff (that will probably be relatively easy to update), but it's a chance to rationalize some of the naming, and bring it closer to the wxWidgets names for things.
The other issue is producing a version of wxEuphoria where the wxEuphoria C code (and possibly wxWidgets, too) is statically linked to euphoria, so you wouldn't need a dll in addition to the euphoria binary. I never got terribly far, but the idea was to build a tool that could take a fresh svn checkout/export of euphoria, and transform it so that it could be build into a wxEuphoria binary. The beginnings of that tool are in the svn trunk.
Matt
5. Re: WxEuphoria
- Posted by Andy Dec 02, 2008
- 938 views
- Last edited Dec 03, 2008
All those ideas sounds good. I hope we see a new release of wxEuphoria by the end of the year.
