OpenEuphoria

2. Re: ver 4.0 source question

• Posted by ne1uno Oct 15, 2008
• 1238 views

I don't 100% understand the question.

with define XXXX 
if !XXXX then 
 
is how it is used. 
exwc -D XXX some.exw 
also works 
 
if not XXXX then 

is not currently supported, but was added as a casual feature request

4. Re: ver 4.0 source question

• Posted by ne1uno Oct 15, 2008
• 1241 views

let me try that again,

with define XXXZ -- exwc -D XXXZ some.exw also works 
 
ifdef !XXXX then  
 printf(1, " XXXX not defined or other than TRUE", {}) 
elsifdef XXXZ then 
 printf(1, "XXXZ is defined TRUE", {}) 
elsedef 
 printf(1, "XXXX not defined or is TRUE", {}) 
end ifdef 
 

test first then post. maybe XXXZ can't happen but you get the idea. with define XXXX=20 doesn't error but seemingly doesn't exactly work

6. Re: ver 4.0 source question

• Posted by DerekParnell (admin) Oct 15, 2008
• 1225 views

I think that "with define XXXX=20" should error, because the concept in Euphoria is that either something is defined or it is not. We are not supposed to be able to assign a specific value to these 'words'. Maybe this is in preparation for a feature later on in v4.1?

8. Re: ver 4.0 source question

• Posted by bernie Oct 15, 2008
• 1184 views

ifdef XXXX then  
   . . . 
end ifdef 

ifdef !XXXX then 
  . . .  
end ifdef 

Hi Derek:

Yes I'am talking the "C" notation in the source code.

What is confusing me is that different developers are using different forms of the conditional notation.

Are we sure that this is supported on any compiler. I kind of thought that #if, #ifndef and etc. is generic but I'am not sure where the #if define(XXXX) is coming from. I can't find any information in the Watcom hlp files about it. I'am trying to understand the logic for the compiler when using it for WIN98 because the conditionals don't make sense to me.

Bernie

10. Re: ver 4.0 source question

• Posted by bernie Oct 15, 2008
• 1191 views

#if !defined(__WATCOMC__) && (WINVER > 0x0400) 
  
#endif 

No I miss spelled it in my Post.

12. Re: ver 4.0 source question

• Posted by bernie Oct 15, 2008
• 1233 views

  #if !XXXX 

Thanks Matt and etal that is what I needed to know.

PS: Matt: If you do a check-in of any SVN source after ver 1991.
This is where the compile fails; maybe a file is missing.

---------------------------------------------------------  
        mkdir dosbkobj\back 
        wmake -f makefile.wat .\intobj\main-.c EX="c:\eu1\bin"\exwc.exe EU_TARGE 
T=int. OBJDIR=intobj DEBUG= MANAGED_MEM=1 
Open Watcom Make Version 1.6 
Portions Copyright (c) 1988-2002 Sybase, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 
Source code is available under the Sybase Open Watcom Public License. 
See http://www.openwatcom.org/ for details. 
        c:\eu1\bin\exwc.exe -i ..\include revget.ex 
        cd .\intobj 
        del *.c 
Could Not Find C:\1205\source\intobj\*.c 
Error(E42): Last command making (.\intobj\main-.c) returned a bad status 
Error(E02): Make execution terminated 
Error(E42): Last command making (interpreter) returned a bad status 
Error(E02): Make execution terminated 
Error(E42): Last command making (winall) returned a bad status 
Error(E02): Make execution terminated 
Error(E42): Last command making (all) returned a bad status 
Error(E02): Make execution terminated 
---------------------------------------------------------------------