Re: Project Leviathan - wxEuphoria 3.1.0 alpha1
- Posted by petelomax Jan 15, 2017
- 1795 views
ghaberek said...
Do you know of any outstanding memory issues with the original wxEuphoria?
No (as per that thread I mentioned I expect there will be times when wxdll:free() must be invoked instead of free(), and that sort of thing)
[EDIT] Actually, with the new or old, if you have sequence s = wxdll:somefunc(), then some time later the refcount of s drops to zero, I predict it will invoke the wrong free().
ghaberek said...
Did it (the original wxEuphoria) work with Phix?
No
ghaberek said...
Can we make this work?
Not if the abstraction bleeds internal (4.1-specific) implementation details. (see that thread for why I am saying that)
Pete
