Re: better flatten()?

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message
petelomax said...

I'm not absolutely against the idea of two functions, but I'm not convinced we really need that split yet either.

It seemed reasonable to me that flatten_all() always returned a sequence of atoms, but flatten_seq() handled strings gracefully.

-Greg

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu