Historical Gui_pro_con, Revision 1
Euphoria Toolkits
Alphabetical Order
| Toolkit | OS | Pro | Con | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| euGTK | Linux also Windows |
* euphoric flavor * native Linux with minimal installation |
* not as handy for win users | |
| euIUP | multi | * euphoric flavour | * no longer maintained | |
| "iup4EU" | multi | * native look * has editor |
* just created * more 'C' based flavour |
|
| REDY | Windows | * completely euphoric * all Euphoria code |
* custom interface * no Linux "yet" * under development |
|
| tinEWG | Windows | * simplistic * easy to use * has IDE |
* lacks fancy widgets | |
| win32LIBEX | Windows | * native * established * Judith's IDE |
* fixed positioning | |
| wxWIDGETS | multi | * native look * full featured * editor |
* distinct flavour |
Flavour pertains to how euphoric the interface is. A euphoric flavour feels more compatible with the way Euphoria code is written. An un-euphoric flavor feels more compatible with the original design of the toolkit--may be distinct, more 'C' than Euphoria, more OS specific than Euphoria.
Some will find an un-euphoric flavor an adavantage, the toolkit itself and third party documentation may be easier to understand.
- diff to current revision, view current revision history, backlinks
- Last modified Oct 29, 2015 by _tom
