Re: Tutorial of sorts
Irv Mullins wrote:
> Some very good points:
> Let's try to develop this as if it were a real-life programming
> project.
> I will supply the main body of code, written so that a client
> could understand it. (They tend to like things like that.)
>
> Anyone who wants to work on the tutorial can supply the functions/
> procedures needed to implement the code. There *MUST* be more than
> one way to implement each of these. Some ways are more Euphoric
> than others. I hope to see some examples! Here goes:
I've been rather busy trying to get my Debian Linux system up and running
correctly and therefore haven't had much time for Euphoria. But I've been
watching this mailing list and this thread in particular is getting more and
more interesting. ;') At first, it seemed to be rather simplistic even to
my poor programming skills. As it has gone on, it has gotten better and
better. Now it looks like it's going to teach me yet another thing: how to
program as part of a team. Now, I'm not sure that's exactly what is
intended, but it sort of looks that way. If so, I'd like to suggest we make
some sort of rules about how the various sections or modules of this program
fit together. The validation part has this criteria, but so far, the rest
doesn't seem to. Well, once again, thanks for giving me some excellant stuff
to look at! ;')
\/\/ood/\/\age
PS: I'm still enjoying the Windoze tutorial too. When I get stuff set up,
I'm gonna be working on a lot of this stuff.
PPS: You know, guys, we need to work on that Euphoric OS in here. There is
excellant back and forth error correction, optimizing, and just general
brainstorming in here. ;')
PPPS: Anybody know how different the Linux brand Euphoria is? (I promise,
that's all the P's I'm gonna put on the PS. <grin>)
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
