Re: Jiri's Flames, EuOS, Euphoria's Place
- Posted by Nate Brooman <nateb at LOG.ON.CA> Sep 29, 1998
- 473 views
No offence Ralf, but it is going through. Think about it. We can't possibly do a real super-duper OS (unless we try in Euphoria. I'm thinking of re-writing the whole thing in C++, but Euphoria is good enough now. - Nate ---------- > From: Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen <nieuwen at XS4ALL.NL> > To: EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU > Subject: Jiri's Flames, EuOS, Euphoria's Place > Date: September 29, 1998 2:08 AM > > After reading the suggestion pointed to Matt to combine some of his message, > I jumped back to a some time ago, when I also did this. It helps some people > out here on the list, that have no interest in my mail, or are pretty > uncapable of handling it. (point of perspective) > > First of all, Matt, although I too admit its annoying to get 5 to 10 mails a > day containing 1 or maybe 2 if we're lucky lines. But Jiri was kinda mean, > since you mean it all well, and are just obviously enthousiastic for > Euphoria. In other words, listen to the advice, but dont take it personally, > it seems Jiri is either making a point of something or flaming some one > down, because he is a bit annoyed by the person. Im not gonna judge this > dominant behaviour, but I want you too know, not all Euphorians on this > list, share his opinions or at least his tone of voice. > > I would love to see a program that shows off Euphoria, but there are already > a few very nice ones out there. Think of TextGUI. A whole toolkit, in how > much code ? Capable of opening any file of any size for editing. Automatic > virtual memory if you ran out of memory. Etc. Pretty nice, I think. > > But we can always do better, can't we. Some one mentioned the EuOS project. > No offense, but that wont ever happen. First of all, we need to convert > Euphoria to a .com, we need to have code for all places where Euphoria calls > interrupts. (which are functions of the current host operating system). > Plus, most OS cores are written in C and ASM, for the logical reasons. It > has to be really small. It has to have 100% machine control. Etc. A shell is > possible, but I wouldnt wait for that either. OS'es are either built with > marketing or good ideas. > > No, I would like to see a Norton Commander clone. Preferbly using a > graphical dos GUI (david's or Irv's) .. a complete package, with file > viewers, etc. And see how small and safe that will run. (a html viewer!) And > a plug-in editor (for viewers, etc.) so people actually see Euphoria code. > That might get some new fans. > > Ralf