OpenEuphoria

Re: subsequence storage

• Posted by Ad Rienks <Ad_Rienks at COMPUSERVE.COM> Jul 07, 1998
• 503 views

Hawke wrote:

>I ran the tests Ad gave us to try and on my
>machine (Pentium) the subsequence code (part2)
>          ***BEAT***
>the sequence code (part1) every time by a
>factor of 150% (0.06-part1 vs 0.04-part2)
>I found this interesting :)

>--Hawke'

On my machine (P75, 8Mb) the results were even more interesting: sometime=
s
the first gave 0.11 and the second 0.16-0.17, but another time it was jus=
t
the opposite (0.17 vs 0.11). Only when I set reps to 100.000, the second
test hung my machine under DOS, and gave 'data too big for memory' or
something like that, when run in W95, using D. Cuny's editor. Have to tes=
t
that again after installing 32 extra Mb's.
I've got them here, actually!

Ad