Re: Trademarks (was: include statement bugs)

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Hi, Juergen, again!

See, please, below you wrote:

> Igor Kachan wrote:

But there are no my words below Patrick's words at all.
So it is something wrong in your post.

Do you see now?

Do you want me to answer? 

----------
> From: Juergen Luethje <j.lue at gmx.de>
> To: EUforum at topica.com
> Subject: Trademarks (was: include statement bugs)
> Sent: 20 oct 2004 y. 15:35
> 
> 
> Igor Kachan wrote:
> 
> > Patrick Barnes wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
>  >> A NAME is not intellectual property. It never is, if you had any idea
> >> about legal mumbo jumbo.
> >> A NAME can be a trademark. However, you cannot trademark generic
> >> terms. Noone can trademark the name "math.e", because it is a generic
> >> term.
> 
> What about chairs, tables and windows? Those are generic terms, aren't
> they? AFAIK some people at Redmond think, that they can copyright (or
> trademark or whatever the proper expression is) windows.
> This is a very tricky field, those people at Redmond probably will not
> engage 1 lawyer, but 4 or more when they want to solve any problem in
> this regard. Also, there are different laws in different countries.
> 
> <snip>
> 
> Regards,
>    Juergen
-----


Regards,
Igor Kachan
kinz at peterlink.ru

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu