OpenEuphoria

Re: include statement bugs

• Posted by "Igor Kachan" <kinz at peterlink.ru> Oct 18, 2004
• 923 views

Hi, Lucius!

You wrote:

[snip]

> > The Euphoria include files are too specialized, not usual, files.
> > They are the libraries of functions, procedures and constants for
> > the universal using.
> > 
> > Do you know any other programming language with the duplicate
> > libraries names?
> > 
> > What a crazy fantasy to have duplicate names in different folders
> > for the main programming stuff in Euphoria?
> > 
> > If you have such the duplicated names, it is just yours mistake,
> > yours problem, yours bug -- nothing more.
> > 
> > Rename it and forget about that "problem".
> > 
> > It is not a Euphoria bug. It is a normal practice to have
> > the different names for the different libraries.
> > 
> > Delete double - this is the most productive programming rule.
> > 
> > 
> Another one blinded.
> 
> johnny/text.e
> global function center(sequence data)
>   -- fill in code
> end function

Who is that johnny?

> alfred/text.e
> global function justify(sequence text)
>   -- fill in code
> end function

Who is that alfred?

> Both libs have nothing in common and neither of them belong to me.
> now, that is just a simple short example.  Not shrouded or anything like
> that.
> but the problem goes much deeper because of collective libs.

The lagest collection of the Euphoria libs is the RDS Archive.

Are those johnny & alfred thinking that their text.e have
the same name and this same name will confuse most of EU
users ANYWAY ?

> Win32 is a collection of libs
> kat has her collection of libs
> I have mine. You may have yours.  We will likely duplicate names
>  without knowing it.

You want to program without knowing the language, it seems to me.

> You may want to use others libs that clash.
> 1: Namespace clash - both libs have some routines named the same
> 2: Filenaming clash - both libs have have the same filename.
> Neither developer had any clue of the other and neither should have to
> give up their name.  A simple solution is.
> 
> unkmar/lib.e
> scooby/lib.e
> jami/lib.e
> derek/lib.e
> wingzero/lib.e
> ....

Try please the below thing instead:

unkmarlib.e
scoobylib.e
jamilib.e
dereklib.e
wingzerolib.e

And you'll never have a problem, this solution is without endless 
/////////  at all, 
and it works just now, do you see ????

I think those johnny & alfred  will rename their libbies just now,
to avoid The Giant Crash of Euphoria becouse of that terrible Rob's bug.

Hey, johnny & alfred, am I right?

Regards,
Igor Kachan
kinz at peterlink.ru