Re: direction
- Posted by Jay Daulton <JayD at ADVANCEDBIONICS.COM> Mar 22, 2000
- 432 views
a=. 'I always wondered how a million monkeys could produce the full contents of the Encylopedia Britannica. Now it''s obvious: they could do it in APL or J... and nobody could prove they didn''t... Of course nobody could use it... ' ((# ? #) { ])^: 10000 a Pots lueN ueodm.rl . sebeououLl svffohswnd lhcacohol iedsiE u rou ewa diptdsn lutnJnrlyeyo eatoo.n if clAlpraly ddny.uIt o i rOcovh'nuoorB ek c b.o yon.ncwstdto c pyoiiy edo .c: ddaenac.'e ndti. bnotohtnoi maddewi ti. Makes more sense to me after the 10000th shuffle. I do take offense at 'maddewi ti', the rest I can handle. ((# ? #) { ])^: 10000 a This took 2.2 seconds on a Pentium 400. How long in Euphoria? Jay Daulton -----Original Message----- From: Joel Crook [mailto:joel at MAIL.K-A.COM] Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 5:21 PM To: EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU Subject: Re: direction I always wondered how a million monkeys could produce the full contents of the Encylopedia Britannica. Now it's obvious: they could do it in APL or J... and nobody could prove they didn't... Of course nobody could use it... At 05:48 PM 03/22/2000 -0500, you wrote: >APL -- A PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE > > > Gee what a unique name for a computer langauge. That must be why hundreds > > of billons of users are using this language and all you need is the > > special keyboard or software drivers that can do over-strike characters. > > Now all I need is to get that old selectric terminal out and hooker up > > to the 1160. Joel "When the code works perfectly, the program is obsolete." -- "The Gosple According to St. Murphy"