Re: Challenging you all
- Posted by katsmeow Feb 01, 2015
- 1280 views
Let me challenge all of you to:
have GOOD FAITH not DISBELIef
COLLABORATE not NIT-PICK
BE CONCISE not VERBACIOUS
OPEN not JUDGMENTAL
NOT QUOTING THAT MUCH
but before all:
BE POSITIVE not NEGATIVE
THUS
RESPECTFULLY following the rules of conduct on this forum.
The way Euphoria was going to be develloped was agreed upon after a poll
BUT NOT
..HOW..TO ACHIEVE THAT
and
..HOW..to !COOPERATE!
LET'S HAVE A POLL ON THAT ISSUE
What's the point of this post?!? I don't understand it at all, especially the title.
I hope this not part of the ongoing useless_ spate, because I am really getting fed up with it.
It has nothing to do with me, actually. Ekhnat0n merely rephrased (and expounded on) what Derek said in another thread about OE needing a benevolent dictator to bring together the project and get finished product out the door.
Agreed. I think we need to respect the evidence before us that Ekhnat0n's mission as the internet voice of his anonymous "Teacher" is of no constructive use to the development of OpenEuphoria.
Except there is no one speaking for the devs, there seems to be no leader. And this forum has devolved to something less than desireable. I believe Ekhnat0n is simply splitting in a separate post just what Derek has said, and it's good business sense, even if the words Ekhnat0n used aren't your colloquial terms.
Ekhnat0n's manic posts exhibit classic signs of delusions of grandeur. I urge him to seek psychiatric help - and I wish him well.
That's a violation of the Code of Conduct. Ironically, Ekhnat0n post which you are attacking exhorted you to be civil (in his own Words) Anyone running for president of the usa within my lifetime has exhibited "delusions" of grandeur, it's almost a requirement, to believe they can do the job.
Continueing to publish his incoherent, rambling posts on this forum serve's no constructive purpose. I urge the moderator(s) to ban him.
Respectfully, K_D_R
But of course. If you don't like or understand the words, even if the message is good, even if it's been said in other words by someone you do respect, attack the messenger!
useless
