Re: With or Without Eu....
Hi Lutz,
> I think it's more like this (at least that's my question): Does it do any
harm
> to always include all *.e-files? Would it slow execution down? Might take
some
> milliseconds more to compile, but you would never have to think about the
> exact location of each routine.
I guess it would slow down the time it takes an application to start,
but I don't think it would be noticable.
I consider it (and I would think most would) consider it a bad technique
to include files your not using.
> So my second question is (after the inclusion of all includes): How much
stack
> space is there upon entering assembly routines?
I don't know the answer to your question (actually I'm not really
sure about the question!!!) but I beleive Euphoria has access to the
full resources of the operating system. Meaning .. if Euphoria keeps
asking for memory the OS will keep giving until it starts to cache
on your HDD and slow down.
Ray Smith
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
