Re: Bind Problems (solved?)...
On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, you wrote:
> Robert Craig wrote:
> >Mike Fowler writes:
> >[a bunch of suggestions about the bind program]
> >
> >Thanks for the suggestions.
> >In any redesign of bind, I would seriously consider making
> >it 2-pass, so it could discard any routines, variables or
> >constants that aren't used.
>
> Hmmm. I hate to ask this Rob, but would that be the best way to go?
> Sure, condensing code is a good thing and all, but couldn't this
> seriously affect code performance/requirements between bound and unbound
> code? Even to the extent that the code behaves differently?
<snip>
On the flip side, wouldn't it be nice if bind would discard unused routines
from the Euphoria run-time as well? Then we could get back to writing 5k Hello
World programs, instead of 175k.
Irv
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
