1. Re: euForth
- Posted by Peter Lawrence <peterl at NETLINK.COM.AU> Aug 28, 1999
- 321 views
>Peter Lawrence wrote: > >> Ah, but the highly tuned, platform specific, >> commercial Forths inline practically everything > >Ooops. You're right about that. > >> The disk overhead is more explicit than with other >> virtual memory approaches but they're not essentially >> or qualitatively different. > >I'm still betting on memory beating disk, but I'd love to be proved wrong >here. Disk doesn't beat memory, but Forth virtual memory is neither more nor less constrained to use disk than firmware based virtual memory is. That is, Forth can have lots of buffers in other memory before ever rolling out to disk - and vice versa, firmware based virtual memory also has to roll out to disk when it runs out of real memory. So Forth isn't handicapped for having explicit virtual memory. PML. GST+NPT=JOBS I.e., a Goods and Services Tax (or almost any other broad based production tax), with a Negative Payroll Tax, promotes employment. See http://users.netlink.com.au/~peterl/publicns.html#AFRLET2 and the other items on that page for some reasons why.