1. Food For Thought

Hi All,

First: I would like to say thank you to all those who requested=
 to 
Beta Test Extreme10, and you should receive your copy by the end=
 of 
the day.

Second: Yesterday a very disgruntle Euphorian E-mailed me, and he=
 
made it clear he thought I was misleading the community by=
 implying 
that Euphoria does not need improvement. I never implied Euphoria=
 
does not need improvement, but I do disagree with the recent=
 request 
for changes by some of our fellow members. 

I thought the purpose of Euphoria was to get away from the 
constraints of Basic, and give novices the opportunity to learn a=
 
powerful language in half the time as other languages. Aren't we=
 
defeating our purpose if we start comparing Euphoria to major 
languages like Basic or C/C++? No offence but who cares about=
 "goto"? 
If goto is so important, go to the language that supports it.=
 There 
is an opportunity for all of us here to take part in creating 
something "NEW" and not just create a hybrid of 2 or three other=
 
languages. 

Of course Euphoria can be improved, but in my opinion we have=
 only 
scratched the surface of what Euphoria can do. So lets say Robert=
 
does comply with all the change requests, what then? Euphoria=
 will 
not miraculously replace Basic or any other language. It is going=
 to 
take much more than a few simple changes. 

Quick Story:  

A very broke music composer with a lot of talent decides he wants=
 to 
make records. He knows he does not have the money to afford a=
 $100 
dollars an hour for a Recording Studio, so he buys a used=
 computer 
and a Keyboard Synthesizer. He sets his homemade studio up, and 
begins to write music. He began to compose some great pieces with=
 
$550.00 worth of equipment. When he thought he was good enough,=
 he 
went to a major record label with his music, hoping to get a 
production contract. When the music executive heard his music, he=
 
signed him on the spot. While the executive and the composer were=
 
talking, the executive asked him how much money did he spend=
 creating 
such masterpieces, the composer laughed and said $550.00. Of=
 course 
the executive could not believe this. The executive asked the 
composer how could he create such great music with $550.00? The 
composer answered:
" I made the best with what I had, and true talent does not come=
 from 
expensive studios, but from inside".

No matter if Euphoria had all the things we wanted, we would=
 still 
have to write the programs. Euphoria is just the tool, but you=
 guys 
are the talent.

Food for thought.

Christopher Bouzy
 President/CEO

new topic     » topic index » view message » categorize

2. Food For Thought

OK, not *strictly* on the topic of Euphoria, but here are some paper's I've
run across that might resonate.

You might want to check out Worse Is Better, at:
    http://laputa.isdn.uiuc.edu/worse-is-better.html

(You might just want to skip the LISP stuff and search for "worse is
better").

More recent is the discussion on the Big Ball of Mud, at:
    http://laputa.isdn.uiuc.edu/mud/mud.html

Both of these discuss why software may often appear to be suboptimal, and
why this may not be such a bad thing after all.

Finally, a discussion on "open software" is The Cathedral and the Bazaar at:

    http://www.kde.org/food/cathedral/cathedral-paper.html

-- David Cuny

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu