1. Re: VisualBasic Look-a-like
At 09:54 PM 7/19/99 +0300, you wrote:
>C.K. Lester wrote:
>>Use Llama.
>
>Why should I use llama? you didn't give any arguments, witch, I prefer, is a
Why did you call me a witch?
I said "use Llama" because I'm under the impression, somebody correct me if
I'm wrong, that Win32Lib is no longer being developed by the main man (Mr.
Cuny), who has, instead, opted to develop Llama, a similar but expected to
be better Win32 coding environment thingie.
Sure, you could use Win32Lib and, sure, if it gets the job done and you're
a Winblows-coding guru, use it because you can modify it. However, for
those of us who don't care to get too deep into Windows coding and want the
simple faceplate for it (that is, Llama or its ilk), I would think using a
supported/current project would be better. Right? 
>I did check llama all over again, but I'm not sure if I'm going to use it
>now. As David wrote, the menus are missing. But what I'd like to know, are
>the benefits between llama and win32lib.
See my paragraph above. Was just pushing Llama because I think it should be
the Win32 lib of choice due to its likelihood of continued development.
Thanks!
-ck
