1. power(a,0.5) v. sqrt(a)
- Posted by Alan Tu <ATU5713 at COMPUSERVE.COM> Mar 10, 1999
- 362 views
I wrote the following program and ran it on EU v2.1 beta public domain ed= : include machine.e integer num atom t, p tick_rate(1000) num =3D rand(100) set_rand(num) t =3D time() for i =3D 1 to 1000000 do p =3D power(rand(100),0.5) end for ? time() - t set_rand(num) t =3D time() for i =3D 1 to 1000000 do p =3D sqrt(rand(100)) end for ? time() - t I got: with power(a,0.5) 3.332492537 seconds with sqrt(a) 1.192818361 seconds These aren't exact times because I neglected to subtract the loop overhea= d, but they are correct relative to each other. Bob, do you think we should= optimize this? Alan =
2. Re: power(a,0.5) v. sqrt(a)
- Posted by Robert Craig <rds at ATTCANADA.NET> Mar 10, 1999
- 343 views
- Last edited Mar 11, 1999
Alan Tu writes: ... sqrt(a) is faster than power(a, 0.5) ... I'll add it to my long wish list of low-priority optimizations. Thanks, Rob Craig Rapid Deployment Software http://members.aol.com/FilesEu/