Re: Re[2]: (Another) (small) Eu 2.5 feature request.
- Posted by Derek Parnell <ddparnell at bigpond.com> Sep 24, 2004
- 481 views
Patrick Barnes wrote: [snip] > Well, I believe we need a better type-checking system before we can > attempt to do any structures... Agreed. The type system has a *lot* of potential to help us make programs of a higher quality. One of the beauties of it is that its not mandatory and can be used selectively. > If the "of" system was implemented first, that would benefit many > people... even those not using structures. The structure system > couldn't be implemented on its own. > > > Y'know, it's wonderful that a sequence can hold anything... it's much > better than C-style arrays. > However, can *anyone* show me a program where they've used a sequence > variable that was: > 1. Large. > 2. Completely non-homogenous. That is, there was no underlying > structure to the sequence *at all*... > Win32lib has the potential to do that. It uses a type of associative array for some things. -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia