Re: Re[2]: (Another) (small) Eu 2.5 feature request.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

I have to vote against this. It only adds more complexity to an already
easily accessable sequence. Its just as easy to use;

constant a = 1, b = 2, c = 3
sequence array array = repeat(0, 3)
?array[a]
?array[b]
?array[c]



However it would be nice to be able to do this;

sequence array array = repeat(0, 10)
sequence slice sclice = array[5..2]



and maybee some enhanced type checking for valiables, eg;




type word(integer value) }}}



	


	


	

					new topic
							    »
			goto parent
		 		     »
		 topic index
		 » view thread

		     

		 		 	» older message
		 
		 		 	» newer message
		 	



			


		


		


			


				
Search


				

					

						

						
						
						

					

					
				


				
Quick Links

				

				
					
User menu

                                        Not signed in.
					

				
				
				
Misc Menu