OpenEuphoria

Re: [Win32Lib] weird RichEdit problem

• Posted by "danielmoyer" <danielmoyer at prodigy.net> Sep 06, 2004
• 459 views

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Derek Parnell" <guest at RapidEuphoria.com>
To: <EUforum at topica.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2004 9:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Win32Lib] weird RichEdit problem


>
>
> posted by: Derek Parnell <ddparnell at bigpond.com>
>
> danielmoyer wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to develop an application alternately on a laptop & a desk
pc,
> > but a part of the app doesn't run correctly on the desktop, though it
runs
> > just fine on the laptop.
> >
> > The two systems are both running Eu 2.3 & Win32Lib 59.01 for the app,
and
> > the only difference I can see between them is that the desk pc has
Windows
> > 98 1st ed, & the laptop has Windows 98 2nd ed.
>
> Richedit 2.0 was released with Win98 1st Ed.
>
> Richedit 3.0 was unofficially released with 2nd Ed. It officially
> came with Windows ME.
>
> All you need to do is copy the riched20.dll from the laptop to
> the desktop machine. This will "install" RichEdit 3.0 on both
> machines. It is this version that supports more than 32K chars
> by default.

Derek,  I checked my desk pc & it already has:  riched20.dll, Riched32.dll,
& riched.dll (for 16 bit).

When I look at riched20.dll on both desk & laptop, they look identical & do
both have the same checksum, signature, & time/date stamp.

However, for Riched32.dll, while the signature is the same for both, the
time/date stamp is different, as is the checksum.  (timedate for
Riched32.dll on laptop is 3720a1d1, timedate on desk pc is 38555167).

Does this make it seem that if it's the .dll that's the problem, I would
need to copy Riched32.dll from laptop to desk pc, rather than riched32.dll?

Dan


>
> -- 
> Derek Parnell
> Melbourne, Australia
>